Hi need these answrered asap!

Question 64 (1 point) [59] Mike Wixstad asked Mel Montrose, his father-in-law, to sign a note as an accommodation co-maker. Montrose did this for Wixstad as a personal favor to his daughter. Both endorsed the note for value to Carlton who knew that Montrose had signed the note for Wixstad's accommodation only. Which of the following is true? A. Carlton has the right to treat either or both parties as primarily liable on the note. B. Carlton's best basis for recovery is to sue Montrose as an endorser. OC. Montrose has no liability beyond one-half of the face value of the note plus interest. D. In the event Wixstad defaults on the note, notice must be promptly given to Montrose in order to hold him liable