Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Question
1 Approved Answer
Hi there, I actually got a different result for part c). I calculated the p-value using R: prop.test(755, 1000, 0.8, alternative = greater, correct =
Hi there,
I actually got a different result for part c).
I calculated the p-value using R:
prop.test(755, 1000, 0.8, alternative = "greater", correct = F)
which gave a p-value = 0.9998. Thus, the p-value greater than 0.05.
Based on this, I would retain the null hypothesis and conclude that there is not enough evidence that the true proportion of Australians agreeing with the economist's prediction is significantly more than 0.8 at 5% significance.
Below a couple screenshots.
Could you explain where I made a mistake?
Thanks in advance!
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access with AI-Powered Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started