Hi Tutor, could I have the second question answered please?

Jurors place heavy weight on eyewitness testimony when deciding whether a suspect is guilty. Legal evidence suggests that Jurors tend to give more weight to the testimony of eyewitnesses who report that they were condent in remembering the event (Scientic American, 1 January 2'3 1'3). Still, there is mixed evidence in the literature whether the condence with which people remember an event is related to the accuracy of their memories. Your task as a researcher is to clarify this. To this end, you show a crime scene to 123 randomly selected individuals. You then count the number of mistakes they make in recalling the crime scene- Finally, you ask participants to rate how condent they were in recalling the crime scene. Based on their ratings, you assign each participant to either the low condence group {n = 41), the medium condence group (n = 41) or the high condence group [n = 41)- You then run a oneway ANOVA to test if the three groups differ in the number of mistakes made when recalling the crime scene- Experiment Questions 1. Complete the ANDVA table for this analysis. 2. In the present study, the three groups could have been compared using ttests. Dr Parker suggests that a oneway ANOVA is more appropriate to analyse the data from this study. Is Dr Parker correct? I usti your response