Hi tutor, I need help with these questions. Thankyou.

In contract law, which one of the following is the better description of a 'warranty?' Select one: 0 a. A term in a contract that summarises why the parties are entering into the contract for the court. 0 b. A contract will be invalid if this term is not met. 0 c. A party may seek recission of the contract or damages if the other party fails to meet the conditions in this term of the contract. 0 d. A contract will be terminated if this term is not met, at the other party's discretion. \fTHREE of the following seven sentences are TRUE, which ones? Select three. DO NOT SELECT MORE THAN THREE. C] a. An off-market bid cannot be made with both cash and ASX listed shares. C] b. A market bid can be made with shares or cryptocurrency. C] c. A market bid can be made using cash only. C] d. An offmarket bid can be made solely with listed ASX securities. C] e. The Business Judgment Rule is a defense to breach of contract. E] f. An expert statement is needed in a takeover where the bidder and the target share directors. E] g. A person in Australia can sell securities that they don't yet own, at the current market price, in anticipation that the price will fall and he/she will be able to buy those shares at a later time to cover the first sale. Scott, Tony and Julia each own one 1/3 of the shares of Ministers Pty Ltd, which writes and sells speeches for inarticulate politicians. The company is very profitable. Scott has always had a secret crush on Julia. Julia and Tony have always had a crush on each other, but none of the three had ever dated each other ... until now. Scott is finding it increasingly difficult to work at Ministers Pty Ltd, as Julia and Tony parade around showing signs of their new love for each other and taunting Scott. Scott asks Julie and Tony to buy out his shares, as their conduct is becoming oppressive to Scott. They agree but only at 10% of the agreed value of those shares. Scott refuses, and Julie and Tony continue to run the company and flaunt their personal lives. Scott files an action in court seeking to compel Julia and Tony to buy out his shares at a fair market value, due to their oppressive conduct with respect him as a minority shareholder? Which of the following is Most Likely True: O a. Scott has a cause of action against Julia and Tony for breach of contract. O b. Scott has a cause of action against Julia and Tony for oppressive conduct against a minority shareholder under the Corporations Act. O c. Scott has a cause of action against Julia and Tony for breach of Julia's and Tony's fiduciary duties as directors of Ministers Pty Ltd. O d. Scott has a cause of action against Julia and Tony based in tort law.Which m of the following is true? Select one: 0 a. In Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball, Mrs Carlill's claim was not successful because after she bought and used the smoke ball as directed, she did not catch the flu. O b. A court may not use oral statements made by parties to a contract at the time they signed the contract, to form its interpretation of the contract. 0 c. Display of goods on the shelf in a supermarket is an invitation to treat. 0 d. In Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball, Mrs Carlill's claim was not successful because the court held that the advertisement that Carbolic Smoke Ball Company placed in the newspaper was a mere puff and not an offer. Which % of the following is false? Select one: 0 a. The Corporations Act (2001) was approved by all states and territories of Australia. 0 b. The Corporations Act (2001) in Australia was copied from the Corporations Act in the United Kingdom. 0 c. The Corporations Act (2001) replaces certain common law with statutory law. 0 d. The Corporations Act (2001) has been modified since 2001