Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

00
1 Approved Answer

Historically, the common law has required no action at all from those who witness a person in distress unless the bystander created the dangerous condition.

image text in transcribedimage text in transcribedimage text in transcribedimage text in transcribedimage text in transcribed

Historically, the common law has required no action at all from those who witness a person in distress unless the bystander created the dangerous condition. The bystander has been free to walk away, laughing if he wished. This is called the "bystander rule." Some exceptions crept into the law, such as the duty of an employer to assist his worker. The legislatures of some states, such as Vermont and Minnesota, have passed statutes that reversed the common law rule. These so-called Good Samaritan laws place a duty on bystanders to come to the aid of someone in distress if it is reasonable to do so. They also incorporate a minor criminal penalty for failure to do so and immunity from civil liability for negligence. Our concern is with the legal obligation and potential liability of a private citizen coming to the aid of someone in peril. Our lesson also illustrates how a common law principle, honored by many generations of judges, can be overturned by a statute.

Watch this video clip from a Seinfeld episode. In this episode, Jerry, Elaine, Kramer, and George laugh as they watch someone being mugged and robbed and do nothing to help the victim. They are arrested and charged with violating the town's Good Samaritan law for their failure to come to the victim's assistance. Read the Minnesota Good Samaritan statute.

After reading the situation , explain your potential liability for her injuries and the liability of RiverNile, your employer. Consider the following issues. What might be the basis of her claims? What protection, if any, would the Minnesota Good Samaritan Law afford you and/or your employer? What defenses might you have? What might have been your liability if there were no Good Samaritan Law? Would you have gone to her aid if there were no Good Samaritan Law? Why or why not?

image text in transcribedimage text in transcribedimage text in transcribedimage text in transcribedimage text in transcribed
Question 7 Public health surveillance is used to prompt: ry A. control measures. rces OB. isolation effects. llaborate O C. isolation measures. O D. individual observation.1. The language of price controls Suppose that, in a competitive market without government regulations, the equilibrium price of donuts is $1.50 each. Complete the following table by indicating whether each of the statements is an example of a price celling or a price floor and whether it is binding or nonbinding. Statement Price Control Binding or Not Due to new regulations, donut shops that would like to pay better wages in order to hire more workers are prohibited from doing so. The government prohibits donut shops from selling donuts for more than $1.80 each. The government has instituted a legal minimum price of $1.80 each for donuts.D Question 14 1 p Consider a natural monopoly with a large fixed cost and a small and constant marginal cost per unit produced that does not receive any subsidies. Which of the following statements is true? 1. The government should intervene to make sure that there are at least two firms operating in the market which will reduce the prices and costs of the product. II. Government regulation involving marginal cost pricing eliminates the deadweight loss and the monopoly remains profitable. Ill. Government regulation involving average cost pricing always maximizes total surplus. None of the other answers is correct only II is true O only I is true O only Ill is true only II and Ill are true D Question 15 1 pts1 of B (0 complete) OB (book/static) HW Score: g 2016, Gibson Network, Inc, which designs network servers, earned revenues of $720 million. Expenses totaled $520 milion. Gibson collected all but $20 milion of the revenues and paid $570 million on its exporises. fremonts n's top managers are evaluating 2016, and they ask you the following questions: Under accrual accounting, what amount of revenue should Gibson Network report for 20167 How does the revenue principle help to answer these questions? Under accrual accounting. what amount of total expense should Gibson Network report for 20167 Which accounting principle helps to answer this question? Redo parts a and b using the cash basis. Explain how the accrual basis differs from the cash basis. Which financial statement reports revenues and expenses? Which statement reports cash receipts and cash payments? irement a. Under accrual accounting, what amount of revenue should Gibson Network report for 20167 How does the revenue principle help to answer thime questions? amount of revenue that should be roporind for the your is $ million. revenue principle says to record revenue when it has boon . regardless of when Therelore, the amount of revenue reported is what Gibson ter any number in the edit fields and then click Check Answer. Clear All remaining MacBook Air 80QUESTION 1 Anthony Scaramucci, the Owner of White House Pressers adheres to the "principle of rights" theory. Under this theory, a key factor in determining whether a business decision is ethical is how that decision O a. compares to religious principles. O b. affects the rights of others. O c. causes consequences that would follow if everyone in society acted the same way. O d. supports the right to make a profit. QUESTION 2 Congress creates a new law, the Environmental Protection Agency (an administrative agency) issues rules, the amalgamated bankers association (a private organization) issues instructions, Bank of America posts a memo with orders for its employees, and Mila Kunis shares current events with her colleagues. Sources of law include O a. the stories released by news agencies. b. the orders posted by employers. O c. the instructions issued by private associations. O d. the rules issued by federal administrative agencies. QUESTION 3 Gregory Lee Johnson sets fire to an American flag in the back of his home, on his back porch. He filmed himself while doing so and uploaded the video to You Tube. Gregory's actions are O a, subject to reasonable restrictions under the due process clause. Ob protected by the First Amendment. O c. given strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause. O d. expressly prohibited by the Constitution. Click Save and Submit to save and submit. Click Save All Answers to save off answers

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access with AI-Powered Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

International Marketing And Export Management

Authors: Gerald Albaum , Alexander Josiassen , Edwin Duerr

8th Edition

1292016922, 978-1292016924

Students also viewed these Law questions