Holloway v$.$ Dekkers & Twin Lakes Golf Course

Could the combination of emails and the unsigned agreement be the basis for satisfying the signature requirement of the statue of frauds? Why or why not?

Did the court calculate the date correctly? Couldn't Holloway's performance review$/$renewal have taken place well before the end of one year? If so$,$ doesn't that mean the contract falls outside of the statute of frauds?

Is the court allowing Dekkers to use the state of frauds as a shield to defend a legitimate claim by Holloway? Is that fair? If Dekkers was the one who prepared the document, isn't it reasonable to assume that he agreed to it$?$ Shouldn't it be enforceable? Why or why not?