Homework support

Oversimplifying the case of Enron and Arthur Andersen( please google Arthur Andersen case and you will find the case on google ) Enron was using some accounting practices that were questionable. Because Arthur Andersen was an independent auditor, they were responsible for reporting any questionable accounting practices might be risky to the shareholders of Enron. The Security and Exchange Commission was responsible for requiring and publishing accurate information about Enron's accounting information. In the end, a few Enron employees went to jail, and Arthur Andersen stopped doing business under that name.

please answer each of the following points separately and number each answer to help me know each answer related to what and cite your answers and avoid plagiariasm please :

1- Identify what you consider any conflict of interest in this case study in details

2- What could have been done to avoid the conflict of interest you identified ?

3-How would you change the laws to correct the problems that came up in the Enron and Arthur Andersen case?

4-Explore how Enron and Arthur Andersen might have been encouraged to act ethically other than direct legal pressures.

5-To what extent (if any) should sustainability concerns and issues be incorporated in accounting analyses?

6-When (if ever) should organizational decisions with sustainability-related impacts and significant associated cost implications ( saving or expenses) be shared with shareholders ?

7- The final conclusion about the case

please answer in details and cite all the answers