Homework support

See the attached pictures to help craft a response to this case, articulating the main issues and ethical dilemma.Review the assessment criteria below before you begin writing.

Case Study:Conflicting Clients

Topic:Auditing (Confidentiality, Misrepresentation of Facts)

People Involved:

• Jennifer Grace, First-year member of her CPA firm's management group
• Tom Ward, CFO of Fantastic Developments, Inc., a client

While reviewing the current-year audit working papers of Coshocton National Bank (CNB), the engagement manager, Jennifer Grace, noted something curious. In the working papers related to loan valuation, Jennifer saw that the commercial loan of Fantastic Developments had been randomly selected for confirmation but that Fantastic had not responded to either the initial or second confirmation request. The audit staff disposed of this "loose end" by alternate procedures: examining cash collections (which had become somewhat sporadic) and vouching to underlying loan documentation, including a set of recent (unaudited) financial statements that showed Fantastic's solid financial position and operating profitability.

Jennifer noted this reference to Fantastic Developments because this private company was also a client of her firm. In fact, Jennifer had served as the audit senior on Jennifer noted this reference to Fantastic Developments because this private company was also a client of her firm. In fact, Jennifer had served as the audit senior on the prior-year audit of Fantastic. She knew that the company had been struggling for a couple of years and had experienced recurring operating losses. Her knowledge of Fantastic did not reconcile with the discussion in the audit working papers related to the financial statements furnished to the bank.

When Jennifer contacted Fantastic's CFO, Tom Ward, and inquired about the company's apparently miraculous turnaround, he was noncommittal and unhelpful. Tom replied that business had picked up. He apologized for not calling Jennifer's firm himself because he had been so busy, and then he told her that Fantastic had decided to engage another CPA firm for its accounting and auditing needs. Although confused, Jennifer obviously couldn't reject the possibility that this abrupt dismissal was a direct consequence of her inquiry.

As a result, Jennifer wonders whether the financial statements which Fantastic furnished to the bank as a basis for a loan application are fraudulent. The bank apparently has no such suspicion, however.

For this assignment, the below are the Rubric

1-summerize all the relevant facts of the case.

2-Articulates overarching ethical issues including the extent of Jennifer's responsibility to take action; how the interests of the firm (and stockholders) can be balanced against the environmental interests; what obligation the company has to future generations and citizens.

3-mention all stakeholders.

4-say what is the possible alternatives and ethics of each alternative.and which one is the best one.

5-identifies all practical constraints

6-recommends a specific action Jennifer should take

7- conclusion about the case

please answer each number of the items separately, and avoid plagarasim , and number your answers to help me know the answers of each point please

please answer questions in the attached 5 pictures

Instructions for Case Analyses Case Analyses allow students to apply concepts from the course to business situations. Theories, Vocabulary, and examples from the readings should be used. Clear and concise writing shows an ability to directly relate learned material to the Cases. Headings and subheadings should be used to delineate which issue and category is being addressed. Use these guidelines along with the stated assessment criteria to craft your case analyses. Relevant Facts 7 (A) Overview of pertinent points. (B) Describe the background of the situation or business that is relevant to the ethical problem(s) or dilemma(s) of the Case. (C) Highlight information that sets the context for analysis. Ethical Issues 7 (A) State the ethical problem(s) or dilemma(s) (B) Demonstrate a comprehension of ethical concepts. (C) Describe the ethical aspects of the Case. Identim'ng Stakeholders There are always a set of \"usual suspects\" in a Case, so be sure to list everyone who might be connected. Remember that business decisions have far reaching effects, so consider anyone who might be affected by the ethical v II x0 Type here to search 0 lDi iOF-QDEIIQ \"aeeges . . . X Identifying Stakeholders - There are always a set of "usual suspects" in a Case, so be sure to list everyone who might be connected. Remember that business decisions have far reaching effects, so consider anyone who might be affected by the ethical considerations of the Case. Possible Alternatives - (A) Identify solutions can be described for each ethical issue identified. (B) List all solutions and approaches to identified ethical issues. (C) Alternatives may be drawn from the Case, Readings, or personal experience including outside readings Ethics of the Alternatives - (A) Critically assess the alternatives identified for possible recommendation. (B) Describe the ethical implications of each alternative. (C) Consider external and internal aspects of ethical proposals. (D) Apply the "utilitarian" perspective (costs and benefits). 1. Which of the alternatives would provide the greatest benefit to the greatest number? 2. What are the costs in each of the alternatives? Type here to search O W 8:02 AM 21 4/14/2021 19. . . X 3. Which of the alternatives has the highest "cost" factor associated with it? 4. Do the benefits of honesty at all costs outweigh the benefits of obeying the directive? of a supervisor? (E) Apply the "rights" perspective. 1. What does the stakeholder have the right to expect? 2. Which of the alternatives would you want if you were each of the stakeholders? (F) Apply the "justice" perspective (benefits and burdens). 1. Which alternative distributes the benefits and burdens most fairly among the stakeholders? 2. Which stakeholders are most affected by each alternative? Practical Constraints - (A) Possible obstacles to the implementation of the identified alternatives. (B) Ethical problems that may come up in executing each alternative. (C) What unwanted outcomes may result from each alternative? (D) What aspects of the market might obstruct each alternative? Specific Action - (A) Make a recommendation (B) Analysis should provide context for whatever is recommended. Type here to search O W 8:03 AM 12 4/14/2021 19(C) Support recommendations with the readings or other literature. Writing Skill 7 Students, teachers, employees, managers, and even corporations are judged by their ability to communicate. Sadly, communication is somewhat dependent upon the form of presentation, and while it is unfair to penalize a writer for not having a native facility with the language they are using, it is fair to reward a writer for presenting ideas in an organized, and understandable fashion. Again, use obvious headings and subheadings. Remember, less is more. Executive Summaries present items summarily. Legal briefs are called \"brief" for a reason. Concise and eloquent (not prosaic or elaborate) writing will be rewarded. Structural Requirements Using outside resources is encouraged and additional readings round out a student's understanding of the issues. Use the APA style to identify References used in the analysis. All ideas come from somewhere, so it is fair to ask writers to disclose their sources. I. /0 Typeheretosearch 0 ii 0 :1 % E a\" I A a B v 8:04 AM f 4/ 1 4/202 1 Extra Credit Thinking outside of the box in this context should be rewarded, not penalized. Don't be afraid to exercise the imagination, and share a unique vision of the Case. /0 Type here to search