Hopkins, a 75-year-old man, falls unconscious in a busy shopping mall. As paramedics arrive to take him to the hospital, a police officer at the scene, takes Hopkins' phone in the hope of being able to contact his family. In opening the screen, he finds images of naked children on the phone. Hopkins is prosecuted. Does the policeman's search of the phone violate the Constitution necessitating exclusion of the evidence of the images? Why or why not? Argue either side.