How can I answer the following questions please?

Question 9 (1 point) Which statement best describes the legal outcome of BC. 1/. Canadian Forests Ltd (Canfor)? The Court found that the market value of the trees destroyed by the defendant was a suitable proxy for the ecological losses suffered by the plaintiff, and allowed recovery on that basis. :1: Pure ecological losses are not recoverable under Canadian law. The plaintiff, the British Columbia government, was denied standing to recover I for damages for pure environmental loss because as the owner of the property it was entitled only to recover for economic losses. "j, The Court held that the plaintiff could recover for pure environmental loss, but in this case it had failed to bring sufficient evidence to prove those damages. Question 10 (1 point) ABC Gas is successfully sued by its neighbour, John Smith, in strict liability as a result of the release of gasoline by ABC Gas that escaped and contaminated John Smith's land. The cost to clean up JohnSmith's land is $50,000. The court awarded John Smith $50,000 in damages. Is John Smith required to use the damages award to clean up his contaminated land? Nounder Canadian law, damages simply provide monetary compensation for losses suffered, but plaintiffs are not required to use funds to clean up environmental damages. Yesin accordance with the polluter pays principle John is required to use a " damages award to remediate pollution Yes - the Court in Tridan Developments v. Shell held that where a plaintiff has been awarded damages related to pollution, the award must be used to address the pollution in