How can I structure about a statute analysis, using section heading to assist

The followings are the components that I have to cover in my paper.

1. primary/moral justification of a crime that I have choose: In this case, the crime I am choosing is: publicly advertises a reward for the return of anything that has been stolen or lost, and in the advertisement uses words to indicate that no questions will be asked if it is returned,

2. What "pressing and substantial" societal concerns your crime is most likely attempting to address

3. how "pressing and substantial" those societal concerns likely are. Consider multiple justifications if applicable.

4. analyze the constitutionality of the law from a Canadian perspective - i.e., what if any rights / freedoms your law might be violating, and how / why your law might be arbitrary / irrationally connected to its objective, over-broad / fail to impair the right in question as little as possible, and / or be 'grossly disproportionate' in its effects / lack proportionality between the effects of the limiting measure and the objective. Here you can make use of precedent cases and / or your own arguments / counterexamples.

5. conclude by arguing why such a law ought to / ought not to be a law / classified as a 'crime'. In doing so, please consider what effects having such a law might have / be having on the reputation of the administration of justice, detail them, and conclude your paper by recommending whether the State ought to continue to enforce the law you have chosen, seek repeal, or amendment. Remember to include a brief summary of your reasons for or against repeal / amendment.