Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

How can linguistic analysis usingthe subsystems oflanguage,e.g.,phonology,morphology and syntaxplay a role in forensic linguistics?Define/discuss one or more subsystem,explain what linguistic analysis is and how it

How can linguistic analysis usingthe subsystems oflanguage,e.g.,phonology,morphology and syntaxplay a role in forensic linguistics?Define/discuss one or more subsystem,explain what linguistic analysis is and how it is used in crime solving.

Define discourse analysis and explain how it is used in forensic linguistics.Use examples to illustrate.

The Courts have determined that evidence found in search and seizure is valid only if voluntary consent has been obtained from the suspect.What are the pragmatics of consent in search and seizure situations that play a role in determining whether the consent was voluntary or linguistically coerced?State the requirements for consent under the law.Define pragmatics of consent.Explain how pragmatics (and discourse analysis of the interaction between suspect and police officers or the authorities)in a search and seizure situation can influence whether consent was voluntary or coerced.

How have the Courts considered pragmatics in determining whether the authorities had asked for permission to search and whether a suspect has given voluntary consent to a search?How do the standards for interpretation related to pragmatics differ when considering what the authorities said vs.what the suspect said ordid?Discuss.

What are the standards implemented by the Courts to determine whether a suspect has invoked the Right to Counsel?What are the standards followed to determine if the suspect waived the Right to Counsel?State what the law says with regard to Right to Counsel.Explain the standards and explainhow they are implemented.

What steps could the Law and the Courts take to ensure that suspects understand and be able to invoke their Right to Counsel, their right not to answer questions that would incriminate themselves (the Fifth Amendment) and the implications of anything that is said or written in a case against them?

What are the vulnerable populations that Miranda is supposed to protect,in particular?What are the linguistic and pragmatic factors that inhibit thoseprotections,particularlyfor the most vulnerable?

What is the definition of reliability?of validity?What is the difference between reliability and validity?What are some concerns about the reliability and validity of linguistic evidence in Courts (e.g., consent to search, invoking the right to counsel, confessions, and jail-house informants)?What are some recommendations solutions to increase reliability and ensure validity of linguistic evidence?

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image_2

Step: 3

blur-text-image_3

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Tort Law Text Cases And Materials

Authors: Jenny Steele

5th Edition

0198853912, 978-0198853916

More Books

Students also viewed these Law questions