1. How do the ICJ's approach in Marshall Islands and ITLOS approach in Norstar on the existence of a dispute compare? How do other cases compare with that?
2. What is the relevance of negotiations and exchange of views?
3. What ought to happen to disputes that States-parties have excluded from the scope of UNCLOS dispute settlement procedures?
4. Does ITLOS balance competing interests correctly when dealing with prompt release requests?
5. Is the ITLOS approach to the nationality of a ship satisfactory?
6. Are ITLOS and ICJ approaches to provisional measures similar? Do their statutory bases require the same thing?
7. What criteria does ITLOS use in Ukraine v Russia to determine what military or law-enforcement activities are? Is the Tribunal's approach reasonable?
8. How does UNCLOS Tribunals' use of their applicable law compare to that of the ICJ?
9. How does the prompt release procedure differ from that of provisional measures?
10. What is the role of CLCS in relation to tribunals?