1. How is a crime committed by a business entity is different from a crime committed by a natural person. Outline at least two differences.  (For instance, can a business entity be effectively punished? Can a business be deterred from law-breaking? Can a business entity have "intent"?  Can a business  entity "go to jail"?  Etc.)
2. Should a business entity be liable for its criminal actions? Or should the business entity's management and employees be held solely liable for criminal actions that benefit the business? Or should both the business entity and its management & employees be held liable? Explain.
3. Briefly outline two of the criticisms the Economist articles (Economist - The Criminalisation of American Business.pdf Download Economist - The Criminalisation of American Business.pdf; Economist - Criminalising the American Company - A Mammoth Guilt Trip.pdf Download Economist - Criminalising the American Company - A Mammoth Guilt Trip.pdf) offer of what the Economist calls the "Criminalisation of American Business."  Do you agree with the Economist's criticisms? Why or why not?