How might modern professional historians distort the accuracy of history, either intentionally or unintentionally? (Select two or more that apply!) Select 2 correct answer(s) They might exaggerate or omit facts for the sake of creating an original or controversial argument. They are typically uninterested in the field of history and are only in it for the fortune and glory that only a career in the Humanities can offer. Therefore, their methodology is slapdash and uninformed. They might make the same argument, using the same methodology, as another historian for the purpose of advancing their career. Their memories are like everyone else's: imperfect and inclined to distort facts due to their own beliefs, circumstances, experiences, and personal politics. Question 2 (5 points) Listen This is manufactured top soil found throughout the Amazonian River Basin that would have enabled crop cultivation in the nutrient-poor jungle. terra preta Oquipu obsidian Quechua Chp