how to do it thanks

Alexia is buying new furniture for the ofce. She visits the showroom at Impact Furniture, and selects some couches for the foyer and staff room, as well as a matching table and chairs. The couches and chairs are upholstered in fabric, rather than leather, and Alexia is concerned about spills staining the furniture. Before signing the contract, she asks the salesperson, Jane, whether the fabric is stain resistant, and Jane assures her that the fabric is pre-treated to repel any spills. Alexia is happy to hear that, and tells Jane that she would not have bought the furniture otherwise, particularly as it is expensive. Alexia signs the contract without reading it. The contract states that payment in full must be made on delivery of the furniture. The contract does not specify that the fabric is pre-treated and spill resistant. A visitor to Alexia's ofce spills their coffee all over one of the new couches in the foyer, and it is badly stained, ruining the fabric and making the couch unsuitable for use. Applying the reasonable person test to see whether Jane's oral statement was promissory, which of the following is INCORRECT: INCORRECT: Select one: 0 a. Jane's statement may be classied as a promise due to the close proximity of when it was made relative to when the contract was formed. 0 b. If Jane is the manager of the store, and an experienced salesperson with expertise and superior knowledge and skills, her statement is more likely to be promissory. O c. If Jane is a new and junior trainee salesperson, with little experience, her statement is less likely to be promissory. 0 d. Jane's statement was not important to Alexia in the overall context of the contract as she needed to buy new furniture and this was her priority, so Jane's statement is less likely to be promissory