https://archive.org/stream/JusticeWhatIsTheRightThingToDoByMichaelSandel/Justice+What+is+the+Right+Thing+to+Do+by+Michael+Sandel_djvu.txt

After reading Sandel's Chapter 5, "What Matters is the Motive / Immanuel Kant," according to Kantian viewpoint:

Q1. A class-action lawsuit was filed against Allstate and Farmers Insurance Companies over a practice called "double rounding." Under this method, an insurer would "round up' a premium of, say, $1,000.50 to $1,001. The companies would then round again for semi-annual premiums. So, $500.50 becomes $501, resulting in an insured paying $1,002 annually, or an extra $1.50 per year. The case settled. State Farm paid each plaintiff-driver in the class $5.50. The plaintiffs'-drivers' attorneys received a fee of $10.3 Million. Would Kant say that justice was achieved here?

Q2. Notwithstanding the indisputably profound and positive contributions of Immanuel Kant to ethics, based on your understanding of his writings, would you say that he had too much time on his hands?