https://publishing.insead.edu/case/xaus-lodge-white-elephant-heart-community

!Xaus Lodge: From White Elephant to the Heart of the Community - 45 marks total Question 1: The Khomani San and Mier communities received land and a government grant to build a lodge for the purposes of earning tourism revenue. However, the lodge failed as a business and was subsequently abandoned. According to the case, what factors contributed to the failure? [S marks) Question 2 What were the negative environmental impacts of the original setup of the lodge (before it failed)? (2 marks) Question 3; In the original establishment of the lodge, what factors impacted supply and demand? In your answer, be sure to explain the effects of these factors on supply and demand and how this contributed to its failure as a business (6 marks) Question 4: Through the management agreement with THPD, the lodge was revived and became operational. How did the government contribute to the success of the lodge? (2 marks) Question 5 How has the agreement with TFPD and the resulting increase in tourism to the region had a positive impact on economic growth for the local community? Inviour answer, be sure to consider various economic topics discussed in class throughout the semester and cite specific information from the case to support your answer. (10 marks) Question 6 What positive contributions to sustainability are evident in the case? In your answer, be sure to consider various aspects of sustainableity including locs culture, environment. charity, etc. (10 morks) Question 7: Do you have any concerns related to continued sustainability for the region in the future? Provide reasoning for your answer: Some areas to consider when forming your answer are government commitment, consumable vs. non- consumable natural resources. copperation oflindigenous people and disruption to their natural lifestyles, uniqueness of resources (5 marks) O