Question
https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1988/1988canlii45/1988canlii45.html?autocompleteStr=Crocker&autocompletePos=1 Remember also that it's possible for reasonable people to reasonably disagree on the outcome here: the trial judge found in favour of Crocker. The
https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1988/1988canlii45/1988canlii45.html?autocompleteStr=Crocker&autocompletePos=1
Remember also that it's possible for reasonable people to reasonably disagree on the outcome here: the trial judge found in favour of Crocker. The Ontario Court of Appeal, with one judge in dissent, found in favour of the resort.
At this level (the Supreme Court of Canada), Crocker is the Appellant/Plaintiff and Sundance Resorts is the Respondent/Defendant. Crocker "wins".
Remember also that a Waiver or Disclaimer is a form of contract and therefore requires, for our purposes here, that the elements of contract be satisfied
1) There is little surprise that the SCC found there is a duty of care. Reading paragraphs 27 - 29, why did the court hold that the standard of care had not been met? (2 marks)
Step by Step Solution
There are 3 Steps involved in it
Step: 1
Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions
See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success
Step: 2
Step: 3
Ace Your Homework with AI
Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance
Get Started