https://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2012-07/popsci-qampa-how-3-d-motion-tracking-lasers-and-wireless-gadgets-are-helping-olympians-train/ Read the article on the link above. Choose 1 of 5 options below to answer questions Option #1: When was your article or video published to the internet? Where is this information located? Has it ever been edited or updated? Was this information easy to find? Does your article or video relate to a recent discovery, or to older information? When was the original information discovered (or when was the publication date for the original source of this information?) Does this make your chosen article or video seem more reliable or less reliable? Why? Option #2: Who is the intended audience for your article or video? Why does the article or video make you think these people are the target audience? Is the information presented at an appropriate academic level for this audience? How can you tell? Does this make your chosen article or video seem more reliable or less reliable? Why? Option #3: Who is the author for your article or video? Is it one person or a team? What are the author's qualifications? Was this information easy to find? Do they seem qualified to write on the topic? Do they provide any contact information? Does this make your chosen article or video seem more reliable or less reliable? Why? Option #4: Where does the information or data in your article or video come from? Is the information supported with evidence? Does the author cite their sources of information properly? Are the sources from a proper scientific research study? How might you verify any of the information presented in your article or video? Does this make your chosen article or video seem more reliable or less reliable? Why? Option #5: What is the purpose of your article or video? Does it try to inform, teach, sell, entertain, or persuade the audience? Do the authors make their intentions and purpose clear? Is the information fact, opinion, or propaganda? Does the point of view appear objective, impartial, and free from biases? Does this make your chosen article or video seem more reliable or less reliable? Why