https://xconomy.com/boston/2019/09/09/joi-ito-media-lab-resign-jeffrey-epstein-knight-macarthur-pretech-nytimes-harvard/URL above is the article (reading) Thank you very much,

3. Read Epstein Fallout: Joi Ito Resigns From MIT Media Lab, Multiple Boards. (a) Recall our discussions of the importance of higher-orde punishment in norm enforcement models, like that of Panchanathan and Boyd and the one discussed in class. According to such models, why would we punish Joi Ito even though he himself did not solicit sex from minors or otherwise commit sexual offenses? (b) The article indicates that it was well known at the Media Lab that Ito accepted funds from Epstein: In one of the more damning details about how the university lab's fundraising apparatus handled the ongoing influx of cash from Epstein, Farrow reveals: "The effort to conceal the lab's contact with Epstein was so widely known that some staff in the office of the lab's director, Joi Ito, referred to Epstein as Voldemort or 'he who must not be named'." Using what you know about higher-order beliefs and their role in punishment, explain why, if it was so well known that Ito accepted funds from Epstein, it took "a bombshell report in The New Yorker" to topple him