Hudson contracted with Ripley to install solar panels on her boat.The installation went well, seemingly.Unfortunately, two days after the installation the panels stopped working.Ripley claimed that the problem was Hudson's fault, and demanded that he make the system work; Hudson denied responsibility.Ripley had paid Hudson by properly executed check, and Hudson still had not deposited the check at the time of Ripley's demand.The day after receiving the demand, Hudson transferred the apparently-regular, unaltered check to Bishop as an initial retainer for legal services.Bishop did not know of any personal defenses which might apply to the underlying transaction.Hudson did so in bad faith in that he thought that Ripley's claim was valid and was glad to have negotiated the check before Ripley dishonored it.Bishop, who acted honestly and observed reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing, sought payment from Ripley for the check.Ripley refused to pay.Bishop sues at a time within the applicable statute of limitations.How would Ripley win?