Hypothetical and Ethical Dilemma Rachel Woods was a huge fan of the popular television show "Pimp My House." Airing on Tuesday evenings at 9:00 p.m. on the Real Estate Channel, each episode of the show was devoted to the renovation of a subject house for the purposes of 1) increasing the quality of life for its owner and 2) increasing the home's fair market value for eventual resale. While watching the show one particular Tuesday evening, Rachel decided that home improvement truly begins at home. She devised a plan for certain renovations of the ranch-style home she had owned for the past five (5) years. Part of the renovation plan involved expanding the main bathroom in the house, which necessitated the removal of a wall. The following week, Rachel made contractual arrangements with contractor Robert Walls for such improvements. Robert was a longstanding friend of Rachel's, and they had maintained their close friendship since graduating from high school together twenty (20) years ago. Rachel was away at work when Robert began the bathroom wall demolition. He used a hammer to begin the sheet rock removal, and expected to see insulation in the wall interior. Instead, he saw a large metal box. Perplexed and curious about this unusual occurrence, he removed the box from the wall and inspected it. Inside the box was a considerable amount of currency, in $20, $50 and $100 denominations. He proceeded to count the currency, and came to a final tally of $182,000. The currency dated from the 1920s and early 1930s, and Robert surmised that the currency had rested in the wall for over seven decades. Robert immediately called Rachel and told her of his "Tutankhamun-esque" discovery. Rachel immediately took an early lunch and left work for home. In Rachel's living room, the two friends discussed the implications of Robert's discovery. Rachel proposed to pay ten percent (10%) of the find to Robert as a reward, in addition to his contractual compensation for making improvements to the home. Rachel also proposed that the deal be kept confidential, as she did not want to disclose the find to anyone, especially the heirs of George Oleary. O'Leary had died five (5) years ago at the age 101 after having owned the home and living in it continuously since 1927. Rachel had purchased the home from the O'Leary estate. Robert demanded forty percent (40%) of the find as his share, and Rachel refused. Their friendship dissolved immediately. Robert has filed suit against Rachel, demanding the entire amount of the find, $182,000. Rachel has answered the complaint, alleging that she is entitled to the entire amount. George O'Leary's five (5) known heirs have intervened in the litigation, demanding that the $182,000 be awarded entirely to them, to be equally divided into five (5) shares. Decide the case. Business Law