Hypothetical Scenario: Sydney lives in Los Angeles. She received an amazing job offer to move to New York City, so she is heading to the Big Apple. Sydney puts her home on the market to sell. On April 1st, Beatrice the Buyer enters into a contract with Sydney the Seller to buy Sydney's house. The deal is set to close (become final) on April 30th and Beatrice is set to receive the keys to her new home on that day. Beatrice's first priority when looking for a new house was to find a house close to her elderly mother so she could easily check on her every day. Beatrice feels Sydney's house is perfect for her because it is located right next door to the home of Beatrice's mother. On April 5th, Beatrice spends $10,000 to have Sydney's home professionally inspected so she can identify any potential defects or things that need to be fixed. On April 10th, Beatrice hires a moving/storage company for $10,000 and the company begins to pack up Beatrice's current house (which is being sold). Unfortunately, Sydney learns the job offer in New York fell through and on April 25th, Sydney backs out of the contract with Beatrice. Sydney now wants to keep her house. Question: What is Beatrice's best argument she could make to the court in her request for specific relief? Sydney deceived her The house is one-of-a-kind O Beatrice has already spent at least $20,000 in out of pocket costs O Beatrice suffered emotional distress as a result of Sydney's breach of contract