I am doing a project on Intimate partner violence and i'm actually stuck. I came up with two hypothesis which i have already dealt with hypothesis 1 and all i have left with is hypothesis 2 which indicates that women demonstrate a higher victimization than men in intimate partner violence. Based on what will be provided below, i need an essay form interpretation and a substantive conclusion explaining the hypothesis. If it would be possible, you can add some form of statistical conclusion. Just an overall opinion on what is provided if truly women do demonstrate a higher victimization than men in Intimate Partner Violence.

abe X x A - - . 1 Normal 1 No Spac. Heading 1 Heading 2 Headi Font Styles HYPOTHESIS 2 H2: Women demonstrate higher levels of victimization than perpetration as compared to men in Intimate Partner Violence. Null hypothesis: Women and men demonstrate similar levels of victimization than perpetration in Intimate Partner Violence. Women demonstrate higher levels of victimization than perpetration as compared to men in intimate partner violence. In this scenario, we predict that women will have higher levels of victimization than perpetration when compared to men. This is the research prediction, which is the alternative hypothesis. The null should state that there will be no difference between men and women, 1.e., men and women will have the same levels of victimization in intimate partner violence. Accessibility InvestNormal 1/ No Spac.. Heading 1 He Contingency Tables Offender Gender Victim Gender Male Female Total Count 752.000 6783.000 7535.000 Male Expected count 6219.559 1315 441 7535.000 % within row 9.980% 90.020 % 100.000 % % within column 2.142 % 91.341 % 17.714% Count 34359 000 643.000 35002.000 Expected count 28891 441 6110.559 35002.000 Female % within row 98.163 % 1.837% 100.000 % % within column 97.858 % 8.659% 82.286% Count 35111.000 7426.000 42537.000 Total Expected count 35111.000 7426.000 42537.000 % within row 82.542% 17.458 % 100.000 % yo within column 100.000 % 100.000 % 100.000 % Chi-Squared Tests ET Value df P X3 33459.025 1 <.001 accessibility: investigate earchdlcdc aabbccd. aabbcc aabb normal t no spac.. heading font paragraph styles nominal value phi-coefficient cramer v alternative hypothesis significance that women do demonstrate a higher victimization in intimate partner violence than men if chi-square observed has low there is high correlation between the two sets of data values and expected are not equal meaning difference. therefore we accept hypothesis. both difference because will be to zero which might notdesign layout oforiosaf references mailings review view help tell me what you want times new roma aa aabbccdo b i u abe x aabbccd aabbc painter ay spac. happen real life. x-squared too large very any. this case p-value less .05 indicates strong evidence against null probability correct results random case. .001 reject measures association variables. rules: weak positive relation moderate negative words o w pe here searchhead relation. makes us measure relative strength coefficient ranges association. tends indicating towards conclusion: show cessibility. s>