I am stumped at where to start here or even what types of questions I am to ask...

Question:

Now, it's time again to continue ourjourney. We willpause for a bit in the mid-1960s.Just since the last decade, so much has happened:more and more homes are beginning to be outfitted withluxurious machines such as televisions and telephones,the repressive McCarthy Era has ended, and most recently, the nation's psyche is still reeling from the death of its young President .The nation (indeed the world) is on the cusp of tremendous changes. The Great Society is just beginning to be built, the British have invaded American music and culture, theSpace Race is on, and things are definitely heating uparound the other side ofthe globe in a small country called Vietnam. Imagine yourself in the Arizonan desert in 1964. It's hot and dusty, and there is no one around for at least 100 miles. Although it's no longer the "Wild West," Arizona is also fairly isolated compared to more populous areas of the United States. You are tired from the long trip. To overcome the isolation and recover from road-induced fatigue, all of you need towork together in order to identify the person, place or thing of which I am thinking. You may contact each other as often as you would like, but collectively, you mayask me only20 questions before you must identify that about which I am thinking. I will answer each of your 20 questions with one word answers (e.g., yes, no, irrelevant, probably, doubtful, sometimes, usually, rarely, or unknown). Be sure to clearly identify which questions that you want me to answer as part of your allotted 20 questions so that you maximize effectiveness of which questions you really want me to answer. Carry out all of your collaborative discussions here in this forum because your efforts will be graded (using the Class Participation Rubric) based upon what can be seen here. Be sure to consider(a) how the law is central to theories and researchin philosophy, social science, business, and public policy; (b) the role and authority of the judicial system in interpreting the U.S. Constitution; and (c) how the law can infringe on personal liberty.