I believe that Ms. Browne Sanders had grounds to file a sexual harassment lawsuit. The attention paid to Sanders was completely unwanted by her, and it was due to her gender. Another basis for her claim was that when she complained to the human resources department, her management fired her shortly after. The guidelines of the Equal Employment Opportunity Act should have been taken into account when addressing this matter. The fact that she won the case means that the lawsuit was not without merit. Sexual harassment is defined as unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature that tends to create a hostile or offensive work environment. In the case of Ms. Browne Sanders, it appears that she experienced unwanted attention due to her gender, which is a form of sexual harassment. Additionally, the fact that she was fired shortly after filing a complaint with the human resources department could be considered retaliation, which is also illegal under Equal Employment Opportunity Act guidelines. Retaliation can occur when an employer punishes an employee for engaging in legally protected activity, such as complaining about harassment or discrimination. The jury's decision in favor of Ms. Browne Sanders suggests that they found sufficient evidence to support her allegations of sexual harassment and retaliation. Therefore, it can be concluded that she had a valid basis for her claim