I do not need explanations. I need only the answers as soon as possible. These questions might be easy for you, but not for me. Thank you so much for helping me. And I really need your help.

1.Professor Horn states "I plan to sell my stock in Starbucks for $20 per share." Clueless Clark tenders the money for 200 shares, but Horn refuses to sell. In a suit for breach of contract the result will likely be

1. victory for Horn because she is the goddess of contracts
2. victory for Clueless Clark because Horn should have known he lacked capacity
3. victory for Horn because there was no offer
4. victory for Clueless Clark because the law of contracts is strictly applied against snotty lawyers
5. victory for Horn because the acceptance was not valid

2.Billy Bob Bubba is eighteen and has a fondness for race cars and beer. His wealthy uncle, Count Chocula, is concerned about Billy Bob and offers to pay him $10,000 if he will refrain from drinking beer and racing cars until he is 21. Billy Bob complies. In a suit to enforce the contract, a court would likely find

1. contracts to refrain from drinking beer are against public policy
2. there was no consideration
3. the consideration was a forbearance
4. there was no consideration because Billy Bob promised nothing
5. there is insufficient information to determine if there was consideration

3.The law firm Dewey, Screwem & Howe has an oral agreement to sell Ted Turner some prime swamp land in Florida. Which of the following is true?

1. there is no contract because the agreement is not in writing
2. the contract is unenforceable
3. the contract is voidable
4. Ted Turner only buys land in Montana
5. the contract lacks consideration

4.Barbara Walters plans to marry her 22 year-old cabana boy but will protect her assets (in case he runs away with the chamber maid) with a prenuptial agreement. The agreement

1. is not valid unless it is in writing
2. is not a contract
3. is against public policy
4. is not enforceable unless it is in writing
5. makes Cabana Boy an incidental beneficiary

5.If a contract is void

1. no contract exists or there are no legal obligations
2. one party has the option to avoid it
3. the contract exists, but cannot be enforced
4. it violates the parol evidence rule
5. it has been breached