Answered step by step
Verified Expert Solution
Link Copied!

Question

1 Approved Answer

I don't know how to write the conclusion of these findings when looking at the graphs and data shown below. America is at the top

I don't know how to write the conclusion of these findings when looking at the graphs and data shown below.

America is at the top of the scale for the greatest number of people in jail and has the 6th highest incarceration compared to the rest of the world at 531/100,000. While the majority of these encounters are not fatal, we do see fatal police shootings in the United States have been trending up over the last few years. This topic has been a very hot button issues in our society lately as many of these high-profile fatalities have been accused on being related to race and other discriminatory factors, while the law enforcement organization states that they are reacting to high risk factors. We believe that the data can show us a clearer picture and remove the emotion and the politics from these charged events especially when they are still fresh. We propose that there are contributing factors to the increase in police fatalities that can be determined with a regression analysis of the perpetrators' City / State, Age / gender, and their armed / feeling status. We will also explore if there are any commonalities or multiple factors that seem to be combined that are contributing at a higher rate.

The initial analysis we are investigating would be comparing the highest state fatalities compared to those states' overall arrests. The basic hypothesis would be that the states with the most arrests would also have the highest fatality rate. This basic assumption did prove mostly true states marked in green had the highest fatalities and arrests, with the exception of GA which overall lower total arrest (in 2019).

State

<1>

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

Grand Total

Total Arrests

Fatal %

AZ

42

49

44

61

35

45

37

52

31

396

235594

0.00297%

CA

190

139

160

116

135

147

140

128

77

1232

1014785

0.00069%

CT

2

3

5

1

4

5

2

1

1

24

92925

0.00753%

DE

3

1

6

2

2

2

2

1

19

30038

0.02330%

FL

61

60

57

64

63

93

50

62

48

558

679072

0.00103%

GA

29

27

29

44

37

40

51

49

25

331

59704

0.01172%

ND

1

1

3

4

3

3

3

1

19

32647

0.02144%

RI

2

1

1

1

1

1

7

25403

0.02756%

TX

101

81

70

83

108

82

95

118

63

801

624840

0.00112%

VT

1

2

1

2

3

2

2

1

14

15719

0.04453%

Based on our initial hypothesis we would also expect the inverse to be true that the states with the lowest total arrests would also have the lowest number of fatalities. That was incorrect based on the data we can see many other states with lower total arrests but higher number of fatalities. While VT was in the lowest of state arrests and fatalities places like CT had high arrest and fatalities. Another very interesting outlier piece of data is the state of Alabama, they had one of the lowest total arrests only 1831 in 2019 and they also had a lower fatal count of 11 but because of the low total arrest they had the highest percentage of arrest compared to the rest of the US at 0.38%. One of the takes aways from this analysis is how to properly view this data, should this data be broken down by state or are there other factors that are more important. We took the highest and lowest states and performed another analysis comparing based on fatalities to total state population. The result of this type of analysis should help reduce the impact of state size and put everyone on a more level playing field and have less biased perception. This data is fairly straightforward as the states with the highest fatalities have the highest rate per million people. The only exception here likely due to the low population is Vermont which had fatality rate that is more in line with the higher states rather than the lower states.

State

Largest

2019

2019 total

Percentage

Population

Fatalities per million of population

CA

1232

135

1,014,785

0.0133%

39440000

3.422920892

TX

801

108

624,840

0.0173%

28990000

3.725422560

FL

558

63

679,072

0.0093%

21490000

2.931596091

AZ

396

35

235,594

0.0149%

7291843

4.799883925

GA

331

37

59,704

0.0620%

10630000

3.480714958

Smallest

RI

7

0

25,403

0.0000%

1056440

0.000000000

VT

14

3

15,719

0.0191%

643085

4.665013179

ND

19

0

32,647

0.0000%

763724

0.000000000

DE

19

2

30,038

0.0067%

1018396

1.963872600

CT

24

4

92,925

0.0043%

3626205

1.103081596

There could be many different reasons for this that we will work to break down in the following analysis.

Step by Step Solution

There are 3 Steps involved in it

Step: 1

blur-text-image

Get Instant Access to Expert-Tailored Solutions

See step-by-step solutions with expert insights and AI powered tools for academic success

Step: 2

blur-text-image

Step: 3

blur-text-image

Ace Your Homework with AI

Get the answers you need in no time with our AI-driven, step-by-step assistance

Get Started

Recommended Textbook for

Introduction to Operations and Supply Chain Management

Authors: Cecil B. Bozarth, Robert B. Handfield

3rd edition

132747324, 978-0132747325

More Books

Students also viewed these General Management questions