I don't think you need the case study link to answer this question, I have given the scenario and the questions in the picture. I have got answer other times by providing similar information.

3. Flying Saucer Restaurant Ltd. v. Lick's Leasing et al, 2011 ON SC 718 (CanLil) The Flying Saucer Restaurant leased their premises to Lick's Leasing Ltd., who in turn sublet to a tenant who left without paying. The plaintiff then looked to Lick's Leasing for compensa- tion as per the lease, but Lick's had no assets and paid nothing. In this action the Flying Saucer Restaurant is seeking the rent owed from the principal of Lick's leasing, Mrs. Meehan, as well as from several related companies. Explain the arguments for each party. Would it affect you answer if Mrs. Meehan had made a personal guaranty for the rent? What if that guaranty was verbal? What if she had made a misrepresentation? What if the other related corporations were successful, had funds, and were owned by the same people