I don't understand if I am filling this out correctly and explaining it thoroughly

Evaluation Planning Template

Evaluation Focus Area	Audience	Evaluation Question	Use
Student Retention	NPC Administrators
How effective are the current retention strategies in retaining first-year students?	Formative: To inform adjustments to retention strategies based on evaluation findings.
Faculty
Stakeholders
Academic Success	First-year students
What impact does participation in FYSRP have on academic performance?	Summative: To assess the effectiveness of the program in achieving educational outcomes.
Administrators
Faculty

Source:W. K. Kellogg Foundation. (2004). Logic model development guide.https://bttop.org/sites/default/files/public/W.K.%20Kellogg%20LogicModel.pdf

Explanation

The Evaluation Planning Template is a tool that provides a structure for the assessment processes to improve the programs and services available to first-year students at National Park College (NPC). This framework includes the priority topic areas, mentions of the target age group, the formulation of guided questions, and the application of information for formative and summative purposes, respectively. As the FYSRP is multi-faceted, and its goals are multi-dimensional, it is needed as both a formative and summative evaluation tool. Through the constructive way, the process goes on with the project being occasionally reviewed for the feedback to be provided and the corrections made accordingly; this way, the program's objectives will be met to the greatest extent, and the needs of the stakeholders will be satisfied (Caballero, 2020). Concurrently, the summative assessment outlines the program's achievements together with the knowledge of its weaknesses and strengths, ultimately demonstrating its performance and prospects of improvement. Inherent to this sort of evaluation strategy is that it will contribute significantly to the development of transformational outcomes and accountability in NPC.

The scope of the evaluation looks at the core features of the outcome, output, and operation of the FYSRP, i.e., context, implementation, and result, respectively. Contextual issues such as student demography, institutional culture, and program gestation period help create a platform for the apprehension of the program environment (Cardona et al., 2023). They could be part of analyzing influential variables. Implementation revolves around examining the fidelity of the program delivery, which includes resource availability and utilization, as well as considering program guidelines and stakeholder communication. Finally, outcome evaluation is usually done to examine FYSRP's achievements in student retention, academic success, and college engagement. To guarantee statewide evaluation coverage, audiences of the selected audience groups include NPC administrators, faculty members, first-year students, parents/guardians, and community members. Stakeholders with different perceptions and motives to the evaluation processes bring their perspectives and interests such that the FYSRP impact and relevance are comprehensively examined and assessed.

The questions for evaluation have more of a situational or context-based manner, considering the needs and interests of each stakeholder group. Similarly, it should do so in a way that aligns with the overall program's objectives. To pursue the formative goals, the questions aim to identify strengths, weaknesses, and areas where improvements are necessary for the implementation and outcomes. For example, program effectiveness could be explored by understanding the advisory role in academics, using tutoring services, and finding the students' satisfaction with various program elements. The answers to these critical questions enable the active commitment of the population to the program and the creation of an environment where the recommendations can be subject to modification and improvements. While summative evaluation questions seek to understand the program's broad influence and the extent to which it delivers its intended results, formative evaluation questions are interested in the reasons behind the program's apparent failures or weaknesses. Questions are related to measuring different aspects such as retention rate, improvement in academic performance, student involvement, and campus engagement over time. Besides, to dig deep into the issue, summative evaluation questions aim to uncover whether the first year of the FYSRP contributed to students' success beyond the ongoing academic term (Shafiq et al., 2021).

Identifying the most significant questions to be prioritized for evaluation aims at the program's goals, customer interests, and prepositions that can elaborate on decisions. Therefore, issues associated with the main focus of our organization, for instance, student support or engagement, would be put under the magnifying glass to determine the impact on attaining the objectives of the FYSRP (De & Arguello, 2020). Issues that clarify the grey areas of uncertainty or broader program difficulties will be primarily targeted as it will prevent a poor decision-making process based on a failure to take them into account.

In conclusion, the Evaluation Planning Template creates a guided and systematized process for an in-depth evaluation of the FYSRP at NPC. We do this using formative and summative evaluation methods, focusing on key focus areas and involving individuals from relevant sectors. This provides a base for an evaluation that has meaning and results in continuous program improvement.