I have questions about this U$.$S$.$ Supreme Court decision in LARRY THOMPSON, PETITIONER v$.$ PAGIEL CLARK, ET AL$.$ ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.On page $12$ of the dissenting opinion, the Court discusses "malice." Why?

Group of answer choices

"Malice" is in the name of "Malicious Prosecution" so it's is a necessary element.

Because they are angry that the other justices don't agree with them.

Since "actual malice" is required in defamation cases concerning public figures, it should be here, too.