I know the Trial Court ruled in the plaintiff's favor, but does the judgment mean the appeals court ruled in favor of the plaintiff or the defendant? I have to identify which courts ruled in favor of who and a little unsure.

Case 1 Shahin v. Delaware Federal Credit Union United States Court of Appeals, Third Clicut, 602 Fed. Appr. 50 (2015) Background and Facts Nina Shahin deposited a check in the amount of $2,500 into her check- ing account at the Delaware Federal Credit Union (DelOne). DelOne placed a two-business-day "local hold" on the check, pending verification Concerned that the drawer's signature did not match the handwriting on the rest of the check, the bank placed it on a fifteen-day "nonverified hold. Mean- while, a payment from Shahin's checking account to Bank of America was denied for insufficient funch (NSF), and DelOne transferred funds from her savings account to cover other payments. DelOne then imposed two $30 penalties for NSF, as well as transfer fees totaling $6. Shahin filed a suit in a federal district court against DelOne, alleging that the credit union had failed to give her proper notice of the extended hold. The court issued a summary judgment in Shahin's favor. She was awarded the amount of the NSF and transfer fees, plus $1,000, the maximum amount of liability for a notice violation under Regulation CC. Shahin appealed, claiming that the amount of damages was insufficient In the Language of the Court PER CURIAM (By the Whole Court *** Properties of the extended Suled (u) required wnder 12 CFR. Sction 229.23 (od Regulation CCJ. Emphasis added. Shahin claims on appeal that the District Court failed to award sufficient damages. Pursu- ant to 12 CER. Section 229.21, a depository institution that fails to comply with the notice provision of Section 229.13 with respect to any person (A) *** is liable to that person in an amount equal to the sum of (1) Any actual damage nuntained by that person as a result of the failure (2) Such additional amount as the court may allow, scept that m In the case of an individual action, liability under this paragraph shall not be less than $100 nor greater than $1,000+. *** In her motion for summary judgment, Shuhin asserted that DelOne imposed 860 in NSF charges and $6.00 in transfer fees. The summary judgment record supported the District Court's finding that DelOne was liable to Shahin for the NSF and overdraft" fees it imposed those actual damages totaled $66.00. ***Shahin failed to argue or provide evidence to support any other claim for actual damages DelOne was subject to liability to Shabin for penalties under Section 229.21(a)(2).*** The amount of $1,000 was the maximum amount allowable under that provision Decision and Remedy The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the lower court's judg. ment and its award to Shahin of the amount of DelOne's NSF and transfer fees, plus $1,000. The court denied Shahin's claim for further damages. Critical Thinking Economic 25.000 an appropriate penalty for the failure of a depoltory institution to comply wab Regulation CC) notice provision? Why or why not