I need help converting the case below into power point.

Summary of the Case: Obergefell v. Hodges, a significant civil rights event in Ohio and was resolute by the US Supreme Court. The case is concerned with the question of same-sex marriage and whether it is illegal to refuse same-sex couples a marriage license in accordance with the 14^th Amendment to the United States Constitution (Greenberg & Page, 2002).

Title: Obergefell v. Hodges. Several same-sex couples from Ohio who had been denied marriage licenses launched the lawsuit, according to the case's facts. Invoking the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantees of equal protection and due process, the couples claimed that Ohio's prohibition on same-sex unions violated those rights.

History of the case: In 2013, the plaintiffs filed their lawsuit in federal district court in Ohio. In its decision, the court declared Ohio's prohibition on same-sex unions unconstitutional. As an appeal was underway, the judgment was suspended. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals heard an appeal of the case and affirmed the restrictions on same-sex unions. The case was later merged with related cases from Michigan, Kentucky, and Tennessee. A Supreme Court of the United States appeal was then filed in the case (Hamm, 2015). Legal issues: The court's chief legal worries were whether Ohio state went contrary to the equal protection law 14^th Amendment and whether states had the power to define marriage as being between males and females.

Decision: The men to men and women to women marriage was deemed to be constitutionally accepted under the 14th Amendment by the United States Supreme Court in a breakthrough ruling on the 26^th of June, 2015. According the court, states must provide gay couples marriage certificates and gay marriage that take place in other areas in America.

Final judgment: Justice Kennedy wrote the popular ruling, which ruled 5 against 4. Per the court's ruling, the law prohibiting homosexual unions in Ohio state and other areas violate the equal protection law of the 14th Amendment. The lawyers wrote a rebellious opinion. The important human rights case Obergefell v. Hodges, which was in Ohio and ultimately decided by the Supreme Court, has been selected as the topic of discussion in this section of the course.

The case's central issue was same-sex marriage and whether or not it was against the 4^th Amendment to America's Constitution for officials to refuse to grant marriage licenses to same-sex couples. Several same-sex couples who live in Ohio are the plaintiffs in this action. The state had previously denied their requests for marriage authorizations made by these couples. The couples argued that the state of Ohio's ban on same-gender unions violated their constitutional rights to equal protection and due process, which are protected by the Fourteenth Amendment.

The case was first taken before an Ohio federal district court in 2013, and in that same year, the court issued a decision finding in the plaintiffs' favor and declaring Ohio's ban on marriages between people of the same gender to be unconstitutional. Nevertheless, the decision was suspended pending the outcome of the appeal. After that, the case was joined with similar cases from other states and appealed to the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, which ban the laws against gay unions. Following that, a case was appealed to the US Supreme Court.

Problems with the law: The court's main legal issues included whether ban on same-gender unions by state of Ohio violated the equal protection and due process clauses of the 14^th Amendment and whether or not states had the right to determine marriage as union between male and female.

On June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ameria ruled in favor of the complainant, concluding that gay marriage was constitutionally protected under the Fourteenth Amendment. This decision will go down in history as a watershed moment. This choice was historically significant. The court declared that states must issue marriage licenses to couples who have the same sexual orientation and must also recognize same-sex unions that occurred in other states.

Decision and assessment: The majority judgment, written by Justice Anthony Kennedy, was adopted by the court by a vote of 5:4. The court ruled that the laws prohibiting marriage between people of the same gender living in Ohio and other areas violated the law clauses of the 14^th Amendment. The Supreme Court authored opinions that disagreed with the majority decision(Obergefell V. Hodges, 576 U.S. (2015), n.d.).

The outcome of the case affected public rights and liberties positively in Ohio and across the country. It made same-sex marriage legal throughout the entire nation, granting same-sex couples the ability to wed and enabling them to benefit from the same lawful rights and defenses as couples of the opposite sex. Advocates for LGBTQ+ rights welcomed the choice as a historic step toward equality and public acceptance, and they delighted after it was made. It also marked a turning moment for LGBTQ+ rights in American society and law.

On the other hand, individuals who disagreed with the court's interpretation of the Constitution reacted angrily to the verdict. The ruling in the Obergefell v. Hodges case was widely considered as a significant triumph for civilian rights and freedoms in Ohio and the nation.

In conclusion, Ohio's and the entire United States' civil rights and freedoms have been affected by the Obergefell v. Hodges verdict. It has given same-sex marriage legal rights and safety as opposite-sex couples. Advocates for LGBTQ+ rights welcomed the verdict as a significant step to social acceptance and equality. It also changed th popular perception and legal acceptance of LGBTQ+ rights in the United States. But some American do not agreed with how the court's interpreted the Constitution, and opposed the verdict. Overall, the Obergefell v. Hodges decision was seen as a huge triumph for civilian rights and civil liberties in Ohio and across America.

References

Greenberg, E. S., & Page, B. I. (2018). The Struggle for Democracy, 2018 Elections and Updates Edition (12th ed.). Pearson Education.

Hamm. (2015, May 1). Obergefell v. Hodges. www.scotusblog.com.

Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. (2015). (n.d.). Justia Law. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/576/14-556/