I need help finding the counterargument in this case

Legislative Acts:Section 456.059 (3) The threating psychiatrist makes a clinical judgmentthat the patient has the apparent intent and ability to imminently or immediately carry out such threat, the psychiatrist may disclosure patient communications to the extent necessary to warn any potential victim and must disclose patient communications to the extent necessary to communicate the threat to a law enforcement agency.

Facts:

Sues meets a fellow student Ryan of the fall 2019 term. Sue immediately fell in love with him since she saw him. He finally managed to disentangle himself from Sue.

Sue had initially confessed her intentions to slay Ryan to her psychiatrist at the University where the psychiatrist had diagnosed Sue with several serious mental disorders and arranged for her to be involuntarily committed, which occurred the next day. However, when Sue was examined, she appeared to be in a stable mental state and was released. The psychiatrist, notified of the release, consulted with her supervisor, Dr. Ima Kweck. Kweck instructed the psychiatrist to take no further action that might result in any additional detention of Sue.

Ryan Carnation was murdered by Sue. Sue was arrested, booked, and charged with murder. After the police uncovered a journal in Sue's dorm room, Ryan's family found out about Sue's conference with her psychiatric, after which Sue happily told everyone all about it. Her lawyer is pursuing an insanity defense. After all, she was just crazy about Ryan.