I need help response to my peers?

1. Shaelyn said? This question is rather confusing to read at first, it takes a few times to read it to try to generate what it is trying to ask. Within our text, there are examples of how to ask a question to make it clear and simple for everyone. To do this, one would use formal language that most every reader would understand. The presented question is difficult to understand because it includes words that are not typically used within a common text, such as venerate. Therefore, people who are lower grade levels than the audience is intended for would not understand questions such as the one in this discussion question. Although Pelham and Blanton share that the questions should not be asked in a way that seems as the audience is illiterate, but more so in a way that allows everyone to understand the questions and does not make the reader question what the question is even questioning! Second, the question has the word "not" in it which can cause the reader to not quite understand the question. Readers are more inclined to misinterpret negative statements than they would be if the statement was clear and precise, states Pelham and Blanton. Third, avoiding a double-barreled question is more prone to get the response that the researcher is looking for. The presented question contains two different questions, although they might be one in the same. I have learned to ask only one question, even in my training as an addictions counselor. Asking too many questions within one question can be a cause for confusion and evidently only question being answered. Thus, the question can be, "what ideas can cause an individual to conclude that there are consequences to having more specific research methods?

2. Robert said?

External validity refers to how well the findings of a study can be applied or generalized to real-world settings or populations. On the other hand, internal validity focuses on the accuracy and reliability of the study's findings within the specific research context.

Random assignment to conditions helps maximize internal validity by ensuring that participants are assigned to different groups in a way that minimizes potential biases or confounding variables. Random selection, also known as random sampling, enhances external validity by increasing the likelihood that the sample represents the larger population of interest.

Lastly, eliminating confounds is crucial for both internal and external validity. By removing or controlling for confounding variables, researchers can better isolate the relationship between the variables of interest and increase the validity of their findings.