Question

1 Approved Answer

Posted on Jun 13, 2024

I need help! this is what my professor sent me on my assignment: Dorine, You have completed your competency assessment. With this submission, you demonstrated

I need help!

this is what my professor sent me on my assignment:

Dorine, You have completed your competency assessment. With this submission, you demonstrated an introductory level of the module outcomes. Additional revision will be needed to obtain proficiency or mastery. There are more comments in the returned PowerPoint and be sure to read them and address each revision request before turning in your revised competency assessment.The returned PowerPoint is attached can be found at right under this comment window.I am looking forward to seeing your revised PowerPoint.

This is the presentation that I turned in:

NOT YET MET Scientific Method and development of a hypothesis Competency Provides the steps of the scientific method from a reputable source X with explanations Data collected from the scenario is presented clearly X Hypothesis included Data from the scenario was used to develop the hypothesis X Mastery Hypothesis is testable and clearly tied to the data provided in the X scenario Explanation of Experiment Competency Provides outline of experiment to test the provided hypothesis Identifies the independent variables X X X X Identifies the dependent variables Indicates a minimum of three things to be held constant Demonstrates through example the cyclic nature of the scientific X method Three testable questions provided Terminology related to the scientific method is properly utilized X throughout Mastery Steps of the scientific method are logically outlined and applied X correctly Variables and constants identified for experiment are reasonable X Discussion addresses outcome when hypothesis is both supported X and not supported by experiment Testable questions are posed in a manner that would allow effective X testing of the hypothesis Analysis of alternative hypothesis good-neighbors-t..jpg multiethnic-group..jpg thinking-woman-l..jpgdueglobal.brightspace.com/d21/Ims/grades/my_grades/main.d21?ou=170662 Discussion addresses outcome when hypothesis is both supported X and not supported by experiment Testable questions are posed in a manner that would allow effective X testing of the hypothesis Analysis of alternative hypothesis Competency Identifies the neighbor's alternative hypothesis as testable or not X testable Neighbor's alternative hypothesis is discussed X Mastery Explanation includes reasoning for the neighbor's alternative X hypothesis being testable or not testable Total Competency Criteria: 4 Total Mastery Criteria: CLA and Grade Criteria Chart CRITERIA CLA Grade Points Score Meets all competency criteria and 4-6 of mastery criteria 5 A 1000 Meets all competency criteria and 0-3 of mastery criteria A B 850 Meets 10-13 of competency criteria Not Yet Competent* 0 Meets 7-9of competency criteria 2 Not Yet Competent* Not Yet Meets 1-6 of competency criteria Competent* Meets 0 competency criteria 0 Not Yet 0 Competent* Not Yet No submission NA Competent* *Not Yet Competent grades convert to an F at term endSOLVING BUDDY'S 29 PROBLEM USING A BY: DORINE MITCHELL MOM S SCIENTIFIC 34 x METHOD X: 42 NO . X X 2 964+x1+ pas cloood B: 9+1EVIDENCE COLLECTED Buddy was not companion didn't The experiment for the friend to and giving the eating because, of get the sort of is based on get back with the food in the fact that the Food Buddy is Buddy not eating original bag for comparison with used to vis waiting Buddy the current food.TESTABLE HYPOTHESIS Independent and food from the new dependent bag variables defined in the approach of cause and effects. taking the dog's The independent bag with her. the variable refers to dependent variable what is thought as refers to the dog's the cause while refusal to take the dependent vanable is established as the effect. The Independent cartable of the Experiment is defined In the incidence ofOUTLINE OF EXPERIMENT Once the proper dog food was purchased and given to Buddy Buddy began to eat until he was fullEXPERIMENT DETAILS . When the prior dog food was gone the owner thought she would try a new one. . Not knowing that the new dog food was Buddy's comfort food .During her absence buddy may have felt abandoned, plus he was left with a stranger. When the old dog food was purchased, Buddy was eating again.TESTABLE QUESTIONS FOR FRIEND ? ? ? - ? ? ? ? 1? ? ? ? If your we to go out of town and leave someone to look after your pet, would this be the right time to try a new pet food. not knowing if the pet will eat it or not?Outline 9c Replace S A BE Arrange Quick Section ab Ay ~ Aav Styles Shape Effects ~ Select Slides Font Paragraph Drawing Editing 4 The statement from the neighbor that Buddy will not eat because he feels the owner is not coming back, is a testable ANALYSIS hypothesis. This is because Buddy assures OF THE the safety of the owner while he sees her NEIGHBOR'S around thus Buddy could just develop HYPOTHESIS uncertainty and the dislike of the new dogfood.S ab AV ~ Aav V A Arrange Quick Dictate Design Styles ~ Shape Effects Select ~ Ideas Font Paragraph Drawing Editing Voice Designer Gauch Jr, H. G., Gauch J Gauch Jr. H. G., & Gauch H. G. (2003). Scientific method in practice. Cambridge University Press. Andersen, H, & Hepbum, B. (2015). Scientific method. Ameri, B. (2000). Feature based model verification (FBMV): a new concept for RESOURCES hypothesis validation in building reconstruction International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 33(B3/1; PART 3). 24-35. Darus, F. B. & Saat, R. M. (2014) How Do Primary School Students Acquire the Skill of Making Hypothesis. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(2). 20-26