I need help with 1-12. please explain the answers briefly, I did them but I am confused with some so, please give accurate responses.

gnawer the following questions about legal concepts. 1.. Reasoning based on con sequences and rulebased _ reasoning usually reach the Z same conclusion about ' what is right or wrong. True or False? _.' - 2. The idea that acts have a basic moral character is a feature of which form of moral reasoning? (a) rule based reasoning (b) rea soning based on conse- quences 3. In reasoning based on consequences: we are required to count every one affected and to con- sider all the major ways they are affected. True or False? . In reasoning based on con- sequences, we are required to consider multiple alter natives and select the best one. True or False? In reasoning based on consequences, the stan dard used to evaluate alternatives is called __3_ In rulebased reasoning, acts or rules are wrong if they are inconsiscent with human reason. True or False? I Study the following situations, answer the questions, then _" prepare arguments to support your answers. 7. Susan was driving friends to a concert. It was 8 RM. and the concert began at 8:30 PM. Because her friends still needed to pick their tickets up at the will call window, they started pres- suring her to drive faster than the speed limit. She refused and said, \"I just don't want to take a chance on getting a ticket.\" Is Susan using consequential reasoning or reasoning based on eth ical rules here? Why? . 3. In a trash basket she was emptying after school, Carol found a copy of the answer key for an exam she was scheduled to take the next day. Instead of using it, she returned it to the teacher, explaining how she found it. When the teacher asked why she did not use it to cheat. Carol said, \"I just think it is wrong to cheat. When I take tests I am telling the teacher how much I really know. If I cheated it would be a form of lying. I believe lying is wrong. I won't lie even if it might help me.\" Is Carol using reasoning based on consequences or ethical rules here? Why? 3. Rosanna was trying to decide whether to share part of her lunch with Sheila and Fran, who had forgotten theirs. She decided not to, saying, \"I just don't like Sheila, so I won't share with anyone.\" I-Ias Rosanna made any errors in reasoning? If so, which errors? 19. Sharon knows about tax laws and how the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) audits tax returns. She knows a way to cheat on her tax return that would save her almost $2,000. She thinks her chance of being caught is about one in 100. Can this cheat ing be justied by reasoning based on ethical rules? Can it be justied by ethics based on consequences? 11. An ordinance of Walker County provided that all automobiles must pass a smog emissions test once a year. Ross was ticketed because his car had not been inspected and approved at an emissions testing center. Ross claimed to be a skilled mechanic who kept his car well tuned and cleaner than the law required. According to Ross, the law violated his natural rights. Explain why you agree or disagree with Ross. ' : 12. Heather was trying to decide for herself about whether stealing " could ever be justied. She thought about what the world ; would be like if the act of stealing were made universal. She saw - that as soon as one person stole something, it would be imme diately stolen from the thief. Is this universalized state more illogical because spealing has no purpose? Or is it self-defeating because eventually you would run out of things to steal