I Need help with the below info and I need ti to be applied to what I already have and give specifically the below. Please Help!! This is a new question it was a draft and the feedback is this is information about the Constitution instead of applying that information to marijuana regulation. What specific federal and state powers are used to regulate marijuana? What specific rights might be impacted by the marijuana regulatory system in the US? Try to formulate in your mind how American society currently regulates marijuana. Think about the different constitutional law? Where does the federal government's power to regulate marijuana come from in the Constitution? Constitutional Connections: Marijuana regulation and federalism. Second, it specifies the powers that the federal government may exercise. Most of these powers are held concurrently by both the federal government and the states, but a few (for example, the power to coin money) are given exclusively to the federal government.Where do the states' powers to regulate marijuana come from? A total of 36states, the District of Columbia,Guam,Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islandshave approved comprehensive, publicly available medical marijuana/cannabis programs.How do states allow legal marijuana sales if it is illegal under federal law? The federal government is free to enforce its own marijuana laws but requiring state agents to enforce federal laws would be unconstitutional commandeering of a state's resources.What would happen if the federal government decided to no longer allow state legalization efforts? It's the part of the Constitution that says that the federal government, when acting in pursuance of the Constitution, basically trumps, so to speak, state governments. But then there is the 10th Amendment to the Bill of Rights that says that the powers not delegated to the federal government are reserved to the states or the people. Think of an individual right that is impacted by marijuana regulation. How would a court determine if the regulation unconstitutionally violates that right? A decision that a statute is unconstitutional "as applied" onlyaffectsthe person who brought the claim, leaving the statute otherwise in place. Court opinions finding that a law is unconstitutional do not always make it clear whether the decision was based on a facial or as-applied challenge.