I need help with this memo assignment of the "Case of the snitch".I am going to attach the case below. Also, I have attached the rubric below for guidance. Please help me by giving ideas regarding what can I write

7/25/2017 2017SummerB-T-ACC360-46327 Name Case Memo Description Rubric Detail Levels of Achievement Criteria Poor (0) Struggling (1) Novice (2) Competent (3) Pro cient (4) Highly Pro cient (5) Salutation 0% 60 % 70 % 80 % 90 % 100 % Subject line is blank. Subject line or audience is wrong/inappropriate for decision (example: con dential info being sent to outsiders). Audience is appropriate, but the subject line does not anticipate the conversation clearly. Audience is appropriate, and the subject line is technically accurate, but the subject line may be a sentence or way too wordy. Audience is appropriate, and the subject anticipates the conversation. Audience is appropriate, and the subject line is engaging, anticipates the conversation, is brief and clear. 0% 60 % 70 % 80 % 90 % 100 % Background section is missing. Language is taken directly from the game or another source that is unoriginal thought. May require additional information to make the background clear to the memo reader. Ideas are not fully developed. Essential facts were not emphasized appropriately, and editing may not be complete. Statement is technically sound, concise and coherent, but may not be tailored to the setting and audience. Memo is polished and appropriate to the setting and the audience. Writing is concise and coherent. Author's voice was present in the writing. Writing was inclusive and addressed where people are and need to be. The writing is elevated because the author stated values in con ict. 0% 60 % 70 % 80 % 90 % 100 % Weight 15.00% The statement of decision is missing or copied from another source. Author did not fully form a decision. You made a decision, but the reader cannot understand your position clearly. Your statement of decision is objectively clear, but it does not connect with or apply to your audience. You clearly stated your decision and considered others in the framework/thought process. You clearly stated the decision, as well as considered and connected with the audience in the framework. Reason for Decision 0% 60 % 70 % 80 % 90 % 100 % Reasons for decision are missing or copied from another source. As a reader, you cannot tell which ethical norms or principles were important in coming to your decision. You ended up using your own ethical preference rather than the norms of the ethical lenses in your analysis. You used incorrect lenses or only used one lens to explain your solution. Using the norms and framework of multiple (2) ethical lenses, you included the values of more than one lens as you wove a textured response and solution. Using the norms and framework of the ethical lenses, you used both logic and emotion to frame a compelling and inviting response and solution. Weight 10.00% Background Weight 15.00% Statement of Decision Weight 15.00% https://myasucourses.asu.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_86884_1&course_id=_358165_1# 1/2 7/25/2017 2017SummerB-T-ACC360-46327 Levels of Achievement Criteria Poor (0) Struggling (1) Novice (2) Competent (3) Pro cient (4) Highly Pro cient (5) Engaging Conclusion 0% 60 % 70 % 80 % 90 % 100 % The conclusion is missing or copied from another source. Your conclusion did not include either the ideas or the concerns of others. You did not set the stage for further conversation with the individual to whom you are sending the memo. The course of action might be clear to you, but you did not communicate how this decision would impact all of your stakeholders or the culture of the organization. You clearly considered others and the culture of the organization but did not provide an inspiring path forward. Your communication was persuasive as you provided a path forward for action and demonstrated alignment with the organizational values. Your communication was inspiring as you provided path forward for action and vision for transforming the professional culture in which you work. Organization 0% 60 % 70 % 80 % 90 % 100 % Weight 15.00% Multiple missing elements from the memo. Too short to be clear. One or two elements missing or almost completely out of order. No attention to paragraph structure or clarity. All elements present, but out of order, combined paragraphs or elements. Issues with length (too wordy or too brief). Memo is well organized, but may have one combined paragraph or element. Memo is well organized, with clear paragraphs, but runs long (over a page) or short (less than 400 words). Memo is well organized with clear paragraphs and ts 400-500 words. Grammar 0% 60 % 70 % 80 % 90 % 100 % Weight 15.00% Unreadable. Writing has so many spelling and punctuation errors as to be virtually unreadable. Word choice and vocabulary are vague and unclear. Vocabulary used does not address the assignment. Sentences are unclear and cannot be read with uency. Spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and vocabulary usage contain major aws that impede readability. Tone is wildly inconsistent and/or inappropriate. Spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and vocabulary usage contain aws that impede and detract from readability. Tone is inconsistent and/or inappropriate. Sentences are simple and lack variety. A number of grammatical mistakes that detract from meaning are present. Some spelling and punctuation errors exist, but they do not seriously detract from meaning. Some understanding of course content is shown. Word choice and vocabulary are acceptable. Sentences are varied and grammatically correct. Writing is error-free. Word choice and vocabulary show understanding of course content. Word choice is mostly professional. Sentences are varied and grammatically correct. Writing is errorfree. Word choice and vocabulary show an exceptional understanding of course content. Word choice is well matched to the subject and audience. Weight 15.00% View Associated Items Print https://myasucourses.asu.edu/webapps/rubric/do/course/manageRubrics?dispatch=view&context=course&rubricId=_86884_1&course_id=_358165_1# Close Window 2/2 MOVING TO ACTION: THE BAIRD METHOD The Case of the Snitch THE PROBLEM: You are a newly-hired accountant working in the Finance department, and you have just received your CPA license. Finding this job was difficult, but you finally have an in-house job with everything on your wish list for your ideal position. As you audit some expense reports and bills you discover a pattern that appears to have been going on for over a year. One of the top salespeople has been submitting over-stated expenses reports. The discrepancies average about $200 per month and have been as high as $400 per month. During on-boarding, you were told about the company's strict policy that requires receipts for reimbursement, but you also know that the IRS does not require receipts for expenses less than $25, a threshold which none of the missing receipts exceed. You just read an article about a high-profile whistle-blowing case where an employee reported her suspicions that her boss was possible engaged in insider trading. This person faced four months of interrogation from various departments within the company, was \"outed\" to her boss as a \"snitch\" and when asked about an internal transfer was told she could find a transfer within the company by herself or simply find another job. You also remember from your university law classes that whistle-blowers are not protected as much as one would think. The question is: What criteria are you going to use as you determine your path of action which can range from doing nothing, to going to your supervisor, or making an anonymous report to the company hot-line. Ethics GAME All Rights Reserved Baird Decision ModelTable Exercise: Snitch page 1 of 1 4-8-2013