i need quick help

Whilst studying this subject (PMO201), you completed a group assignment that required you to provide evidence of participation enabling progress to be audited and then produced a final report. The following two groups of questions will guide you through a critique and evaluation of your performance. The questions will be marked on your ability to isolate and identify what you did well or could have done better (measured against your group contract - your baseline). Answers should be accurate, brief and written using PRINCE2 terms and language when convenient. Group 1: Questions on identifying performance. (4 marks) Note each part of question 1 is only worth 1/2 a mark each. Answer should be short. If you do not have access to a student group contract, provide your best (most accurate) estimate. 1. (Quality)-What mark did your group seek to achieve in Assignment 2.3 as specified in your (2.1) Student Group Contract? 2. (Quality) - What mark did your group achieve? 3. (Time Management) - How often did you submit your contribution from week 611 that was used in or contributed to the productive development of the final report? 3.1. % of 5 weeks submitted on time: 3.2. Average of number of pages submitted each week: 3.3. Relevance of contribution: (i.e. Was it used, did it contribute productively to the group?): 4. (Cost)-Project's costs are estimated by the amount of labour it takes to complete a project. Student Group Contract to help you estimate your answer)? 5. (Cost) Did you and your team contribute as many hours as you planned and achleve the result that you expected? 5.1. Number of people in your team, and number of hours contributed by your team as a whole: E) Numher nf haure contrihuted bv vou and did vou contribute your fair share? 6. (Risk) List any risks that you could have been better prepared for? These are risks that could or did arise as events whilst developing your final report or could arise in similar projects in the future. 7. (Communication) How regularly did your team plan to meet (face to face or communicate routinely using other methods)? 8. (Communication) Did you meet as frequently as planned, and using the same methods as planned? Group 2: Questions on critiquing and evaluating performance. ( 36 marks) Please keep answers to one well written sentence or a couple of bullet points. Answer all 4 questions, and answers must be constructive. No marks will be given for recognising the fault of other people. Each question includes 4 parts. Marks for each part will be allocated as follows: 1. 3 marks. 2. 3 marks. 3. 1 mark. 4. 2 marks. Each question should take you less than 10 minutes to answer. You are to identify what you could have done better; how you would take records; identify challenges; identify techniques to overcome challenges, in the 5 areas listed below: 1. Quality of your Assignment 2.3 : 1.1. What could your group have done better to either achieve the quality standard you were seeking, or have achieved it more easily? 1.2. How would you measure and record the improvement? 1.3. What communication and/or conflict issues challenged (or could have challenged) the quality of your group assignment? 1.4. What management techniques could be used overcome these challenges? 2. Timeliness in completing Assignment 2,3 : Whilst studying this subject (PMO201), you completed a group assignment that required you to provide evidence of participation enabling progress to be audited and then produced a final report. The following two groups of questions will guide you through a critique and evaluation of your performance. The questions will be marked on your ability to isolate and identify what you did well or could have done better (measured against your group contract - your baseline). Answers should be accurate, brief and written using PRINCE2 terms and language when convenient. Group 1: Questions on identifying performance. (4 marks) Note each part of question 1 is only worth 1/2 a mark each. Answer should be short. If you do not have access to a student group contract, provide your best (most accurate) estimate. 1. (Quality)-What mark did your group seek to achieve in Assignment 2.3 as specified in your (2.1) Student Group Contract? 2. (Quality) - What mark did your group achieve? 3. (Time Management) - How often did you submit your contribution from week 611 that was used in or contributed to the productive development of the final report? 3.1. % of 5 weeks submitted on time: 3.2. Average of number of pages submitted each week: 3.3. Relevance of contribution: (i.e. Was it used, did it contribute productively to the group?): 4. (Cost)-Project's costs are estimated by the amount of labour it takes to complete a project. Student Group Contract to help you estimate your answer)? 5. (Cost) Did you and your team contribute as many hours as you planned and achleve the result that you expected? 5.1. Number of people in your team, and number of hours contributed by your team as a whole: E) Numher nf haure contrihuted bv vou and did vou contribute your fair share? 6. (Risk) List any risks that you could have been better prepared for? These are risks that could or did arise as events whilst developing your final report or could arise in similar projects in the future. 7. (Communication) How regularly did your team plan to meet (face to face or communicate routinely using other methods)? 8. (Communication) Did you meet as frequently as planned, and using the same methods as planned? Group 2: Questions on critiquing and evaluating performance. ( 36 marks) Please keep answers to one well written sentence or a couple of bullet points. Answer all 4 questions, and answers must be constructive. No marks will be given for recognising the fault of other people. Each question includes 4 parts. Marks for each part will be allocated as follows: 1. 3 marks. 2. 3 marks. 3. 1 mark. 4. 2 marks. Each question should take you less than 10 minutes to answer. You are to identify what you could have done better; how you would take records; identify challenges; identify techniques to overcome challenges, in the 5 areas listed below: 1. Quality of your Assignment 2.3 : 1.1. What could your group have done better to either achieve the quality standard you were seeking, or have achieved it more easily? 1.2. How would you measure and record the improvement? 1.3. What communication and/or conflict issues challenged (or could have challenged) the quality of your group assignment? 1.4. What management techniques could be used overcome these challenges? 2. Timeliness in completing Assignment 2,3