i need the first a,b,d only

Malaysia Airlines case (Read the appendices in order to answer the questions). Malaysia Airlines faced business turbulence in 2007-2013 resulted in poor financial performance (refer to the graph below). The question is, what went wrong with its business and financial strategy despite huge cash at the end of 2013? Share price performance, 2003 - 2013 RM 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Close Source: Yahoo Finance KB "AFTER three CEOs, six thousand job cuts and over RM4 billion in funds invested in its five-year turnaround effort so far, national carrier Malaysia Airlines Bhd (MAB) is now flying into the last leg of its journey towards profitability. Its sole shareholder, Khazanah Nasional Bhd, sees a clear path forward to that promised land. Last Friday, Khazanah managing director Tan Sri Azman Mokhtar said he expects the airline to be profitable by mid-2019 at the latest. (Extracted from The Edge 1 February 2018) a) Analyze the position of Malaysia Airlines profile, pre-turnaround program, using Corporate Life Cycle Model (CLC). (4 marks) b) Critically investigate Malaysia Airlines key financial performance and financial strategies for the year 2013. (8 marks) c) In theory, strong cash in the Balance Sheet (Statement of Financial Position) should lead to better share price performance. However, despite strong cash value of RM3.87 billion as at 31 Dec 2013, share price of Malaysia Airlines went down. Explain. (4 marks) d) Discuss the new profile of Malaysia Airlines corporate life cycle (after restructuring) pertaining to business risk, financing risk, funding, earnings per share (EPS) and dividend. (15 marks) e) Recommend new financial strategy suitable for Malaysia Airlines. (6 marks) f) Based on your analysis above, advice your client whether he/she should continue the intention to invest in Malaysia Airlines. (3 marks) Malaysia Airlines case (Read the appendices in order to answer the questions). Malaysia Airlines faced business turbulence in 2007-2013 resulted in poor financial performance (refer to the graph below). The question is, what went wrong with its business and financial strategy despite huge cash at the end of 2013? Share price performance, 2003 - 2013 RM 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Close Source: Yahoo Finance KB "AFTER three CEOs, six thousand job cuts and over RM4 billion in funds invested in its five-year turnaround effort so far, national carrier Malaysia Airlines Bhd (MAB) is now flying into the last leg of its journey towards profitability. Its sole shareholder, Khazanah Nasional Bhd, sees a clear path forward to that promised land. Last Friday, Khazanah managing director Tan Sri Azman Mokhtar said he expects the airline to be profitable by mid-2019 at the latest. (Extracted from The Edge 1 February 2018) a) Analyze the position of Malaysia Airlines profile, pre-turnaround program, using Corporate Life Cycle Model (CLC). (4 marks) b) Critically investigate Malaysia Airlines key financial performance and financial strategies for the year 2013. (8 marks) c) In theory, strong cash in the Balance Sheet (Statement of Financial Position) should lead to better share price performance. However, despite strong cash value of RM3.87 billion as at 31 Dec 2013, share price of Malaysia Airlines went down. Explain. (4 marks) d) Discuss the new profile of Malaysia Airlines corporate life cycle (after restructuring) pertaining to business risk, financing risk, funding, earnings per share (EPS) and dividend. (15 marks) e) Recommend new financial strategy suitable for Malaysia Airlines. (6 marks) f) Based on your analysis above, advice your client whether he/she should continue the intention to invest in Malaysia Airlines