I want legit Answer

Please don't copy from other platforms, I already seen those...I want different answer, please don't copy from other platforms

Transtars, a transport company, got at contract to ship great amount of waste rock from a building site of a river damp to a cement factory nearby. Transtars hired giant lorries from Grand Cars for its work. Technical director of Grand Car told Transtars representative that its lorry's load capacity is 360 tons. Based on that information, Transtars decided to hire 5 lorries to complete the shipping contract in time. However, Transtars could not have its shipping contract finished in time, ause actual load capacity of the lorries is only 300 tons, not 360 tons as stated. Transtars sued Grand Cars for damages caused by misrepresentation. In attempt to reject the cause of action by Transtars, Grand Cars argues that it got information about the load of lorry from an Expert report published in a professional journal in transportation field. Meanwhile, origin technical specification of lorry kept by Grand Cars provides that it is actual load capacity is 300 tons. Based on provisions of Misrepresentation Act 1967 and relevant case law, please discuss: - Was Grand Cars statement a fraudulent or negligent misrepresentation? . What would be the outcome of the case (Who would win