i want some disadvantages of Leadership Recruitment vs Leadership Training on the Groups supporting it with evidence and
when and why leadership selection and training is most appropriate?
and divide the disadvantages wether it is Short-term or Long-term.
u can use the case study attached as a picture to give evidence:
AutoSave (. Off) WK 8 9 Case Study & Worksheet 2018.1(4) (4) - Protected View - Saved to this PC elias albahry EA X File Home Insert Draw Design Layout References Mailings Review View Help 9 Search Share Comments Chapter 11 Case Study: Leadership Factories Companies differ markedly in their ability to produce future leaders, as several recent analyses of the 1187 largest publicly traded US companies revealed. Among the CEOs in one study, a remarkable total of 26 once worked at General Electric (GE). But as the table below shows, on a per-employee basis that earns GE only tenth place in terms of the likelihood of a current or former employee becoming CEO of a large company. Top of the list is management consulting firm Mckinsey & Company. Amazingly, if we extrapolate into the future from the current stock of Mckinsey alumni who are CEOs, of every 690 Mckinsey employees one will become CEO of a Fortune 1000 company. Company Size (employees) CEOs produced Odds Mckinsey & Co. 11 000 16 690:1 Deloitte & Touche 17 170 2150:1 Baxter International 48 000 4365:1 Pricewaterhouse Coopers 47 750 10 Ernst & Young 103 000 Merrill Lynch 62 200 IN 4775:1 8585:1 7 8885:1 Motorola 66 000 7 9430:1 Intel 88 100 8 11 010:1 Procter & Gamble 138 000 12 11 500:1 General Electric (GE) 300 000 26 11 540:1 Some companies did not fare nearly as well, such as Citigroup (odds: 30 180:1), AT&T (odds: 23 220:1) and Johnson & Johnson (odds: 15 275:1) While some might dismiss the results, the companies at the top of the list, not surprisingly, do not. "We are a leadership engine and a talent machine', said retiring Procter & Gamble CEO A. G. Lafley. THINGS TO CONSIDER: 1. Management consulting firms did very well on a per-employee basis, partly because they are mostly comprised of managers (as opposed to blue-collar or entry-level workers). How big a factor do you think the composition of the workforce is in the likelihood of producing a CEO? Do you think so-called leadership factories are also better places for non-leaders to work? Why or why not? Assume that you had job offers from two companies that differed only in how often they produced CEOs. Would this difference affect your decision? 4. Do these data give credence to the value of leader selection and leader development? Why or why not? Page 1 of 2 603 words + 100% Type here to search O 1994 P W A - GD) ENG 10:50 AM 17/04/2020
