I would appreciate any help with these questions at the end of the reading...thank you

J. nvironment of Business, agerial Approach: Theory tice elvin FACT SUMMARY Doloe and MSNBC entered into a two-year employment agreement for DiFoleo to work a television commentator covering the entertainment industry. MSNBC had the right to terminate the agreement after the first year by giving Folco 60 days' advance notice. Diolco's first eight months of employment were fumatous, and she had several disputes with her supervisors over her assignments and working conditions. Through a series of e-mails, Diolco complained to her supervisors about being forced off the air through MSNBC' change in schedule and coverage. One of these e-mails indicated that she wished to have a meeting to discuss her exit from the shows and to give MSNBC ample time to replace her. In that same e-mail, though, Dolco also wrote that she wanted to be part of the MSNBC team for a long time to come. Nonetheless, MSNBC took these e-mails to mean that Di Folce intended to repudiate her contract and want her a proposed separation agreement claiming that she had resigned. DiFolcelled a breach of contract action against MSNBC. The trial court dismissed DiFolco's claim and ruled that the e-mail constituted DiFolco's anticipatory repudiation of her contract with MSNBC pe 220 SYNOPSIS OF DECISION AND OPINION The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed the trial court and ruled in favor of DiFoco on the issue of anticipatory reprodation. The court held that repudiation occurs only when there is a definite and final conmunication of the intention to forge performance in this case, the court analyzed several e-mail exchanges and concluded that DiFoko did not manifeu a clear and requivocal repudiation. The e-mails were ambiguous in terms of what iFolcos future plans may have been and included Diolco's statement that she did not resign and was merely speculating about future time frames. Any assumptions by MSNBC that the resigned or intended to resign before completing her contract were not justified. Therefore, the court reinstated Difoco'y breach of contract claim OTS WORDS OF THE COURT. Repudiation in any event, we do not agree with the District Court that plaintiff's 8/23 e-mail is... wambios in express (Folco's intention to leave' as a matter of law. There are at least factual use as to whether iFolce had made a final and definite communication of an intent to forge performance or had indicated her refusal to perform in a clear and unqualified way muchas to justify concles that she had repudiated her contract. Case Questions 1. Why did the court rule the MSNBC assumptions were not justified 2. If you received an email from an employee the concerned her exit would you believe she was quiting is the situation with DiFolce any different 3. Focus on Critical Thinking Songest language that a court might find as expressing an unumbigun intent to reportiune in this case als J. nvironment of Business, agerial Approach: Theory tice elvin FACT SUMMARY Doloe and MSNBC entered into a two-year employment agreement for DiFoleo to work a television commentator covering the entertainment industry. MSNBC had the right to terminate the agreement after the first year by giving Folco 60 days' advance notice. Diolco's first eight months of employment were fumatous, and she had several disputes with her supervisors over her assignments and working conditions. Through a series of e-mails, Diolco complained to her supervisors about being forced off the air through MSNBC' change in schedule and coverage. One of these e-mails indicated that she wished to have a meeting to discuss her exit from the shows and to give MSNBC ample time to replace her. In that same e-mail, though, Dolco also wrote that she wanted to be part of the MSNBC team for a long time to come. Nonetheless, MSNBC took these e-mails to mean that Di Folce intended to repudiate her contract and want her a proposed separation agreement claiming that she had resigned. DiFolcelled a breach of contract action against MSNBC. The trial court dismissed DiFolco's claim and ruled that the e-mail constituted DiFolco's anticipatory repudiation of her contract with MSNBC pe 220 SYNOPSIS OF DECISION AND OPINION The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed the trial court and ruled in favor of DiFoco on the issue of anticipatory reprodation. The court held that repudiation occurs only when there is a definite and final conmunication of the intention to forge performance in this case, the court analyzed several e-mail exchanges and concluded that DiFoko did not manifeu a clear and requivocal repudiation. The e-mails were ambiguous in terms of what iFolcos future plans may have been and included Diolco's statement that she did not resign and was merely speculating about future time frames. Any assumptions by MSNBC that the resigned or intended to resign before completing her contract were not justified. Therefore, the court reinstated Difoco'y breach of contract claim OTS WORDS OF THE COURT. Repudiation in any event, we do not agree with the District Court that plaintiff's 8/23 e-mail is... wambios in express (Folco's intention to leave' as a matter of law. There are at least factual use as to whether iFolce had made a final and definite communication of an intent to forge performance or had indicated her refusal to perform in a clear and unqualified way muchas to justify concles that she had repudiated her contract. Case Questions 1. Why did the court rule the MSNBC assumptions were not justified 2. If you received an email from an employee the concerned her exit would you believe she was quiting is the situation with DiFolce any different 3. Focus on Critical Thinking Songest language that a court might find as expressing an unumbigun intent to reportiune in this case als