I would like some help with this the problem and question is in the attached file thank you CASE 1 Reynolds Manufacturing Company by Khursheed Omer Reynolds Manufacturing Company manufactures a product that is processed in three sequential departments Lately, the competition in the industry has become very intense as many foreignmanufacturers have introduced their product in the intern ational market at lower prices Management at Reynoldsis consideringprocess improvement They have been told by a sales representative of a manufacturing equipment company that introduction of state of art equipment and several other measures in processing department 1 can significantly reduce the per unit cost of processing This wouldallow competitive pricing of their finished product Cost reduction will be accomplished by eliminating material wastage and eliminating direct labor cost (the new equipment willperform many functions that previously required manual labor) The new system will cost $,320,000 6 and will have a useful life of ten years Accordingly, new equip ment and other measures were introduced on a trial basis Management iseager to find out ifthis changewould yield the desired results At the end of the trial month, the per unit cost figuresand the following partial cost of production report for Process 1prepared by the companyaccountantwas made available continued on ne Beginning Work in Process 60,000units (100 Material, 75 Conversion) Units Started during the month Units to account for 40,000units 100,000 units EQUIVALENT UNITS Direct Material Conversion Total number of units completed 85,000 units 85,000 85,000 Ending Work in Process 15,000 units 15,000 12,000 (100 Material,80 Conversion) Units accounted for 100,000 100,000 97,000 Direct materials Cost of Beginning Work in Process $ 300,000 Cost incurred this month Total Cost Divided by Equivalentunits Conversion $ 450,000 Total $ 750,000 $ 160,000 $ 116,000 $ 276,000 $ 460,000 $ 566,000 $1,026,000 100,000 97,000 $ 4 60 $ 5 84 $ 10 44 The Company CEO and the foreman in charge of the departmentnot arevery enthused by the performance of the new system as they seeno significant difference in pe r unit cost of processing They arewondering if such a huge investment is justified when the company is under intensive competitive pressure However, the equipment sales representative insists that other companies who have purchased this system have experienced significant reduction in the cost of processing You are amanagementconsultant retained by the company You have been asked to look into this issue and make a recommendation to the CEO of the company

Question

I would like some help with this  the problem and question is in the attached file  thank you CASE 1 Reynolds Manufacturing Company by Khursheed Omer Reynolds Manufacturing Company manufactures a product that is processed in three sequential departments  Lately, the competition in the industry has become very intense as many foreignmanufacturers have introduced their product in the intern ational market at lower prices  Management at Reynoldsis consideringprocess improvement   They have been told by a sales representative of a manufacturing equipment company that introduction of state of art equipment and several other measures in processing department  1 can significantly reduce the per unit cost of processing   This wouldallow competitive pricing of their finished product  Cost reduction will be accomplished by eliminating material wastage and eliminating direct labor cost (the new equipment willperform many functions that previously required manual labor) The new system will cost $,320,000 6 and will have a useful life of ten years  Accordingly, new equip ment and other measures were introduced on a trial basis  Management iseager to find out ifthis changewould yield the desired results   At the end of the trial month, the per unit cost figuresand the following partial cost of production report for Process  1prepared by the companyaccountantwas made available         continued on ne Beginning Work in Process 60,000units (100  Material, 75  Conversion) Units Started during the month Units to account for 40,000units                 100,000 units             EQUIVALENT UNITS Direct Material Conversion Total number of units completed 85,000 units 85,000 85,000 Ending Work in Process 15,000 units 15,000 12,000 (100  Material,80 Conversion)                                                                   Units accounted for 100,000 100,000 97,000                                             Direct materials Cost of Beginning Work in Process  $ 300,000 Cost incurred this month  Total Cost Divided by Equivalentunits   Conversion $ 450,000 Total $ 750,000 $ 160,000 $ 116,000 $ 276,000                                                                         $ 460,000 $ 566,000 $1,026,000 100,000 97,000 $ 4 60 $ 5 84 $ 10 44 The Company CEO and the foreman in charge of the departmentnot arevery enthused by the performance of the new system as they seeno significant difference in pe r unit cost of processing  They arewondering if such a huge investment is justified when the company is under intensive competitive pressure However, the equipment sales representative insists that other companies who have purchased this system have experienced significant reduction in the cost of processing You are amanagementconsultant retained by the company You have been asked to look into this issue and make a recommendation to the CEO of the company

Accepted Answer

The Answer is in the image, click to view ...

I would like some help with this. the problem and question is in the attached file. thank

Question:

Fundamentals of Physics

I would like some help with this. the problem and question is in the attached file. thank

Question:

Expert Answer:

The Answer is in the image, click to view ... View the full answer

Fundamentals of Physics

Students also viewed these Accounting questions