I would like you to analyze/break down/summarize the following case Liebeck v McDonald's Restaurants in terms of the Big Issue, Duty of Care, Standard of Care, Causation, Remoteness, Damages, Defences, and Conclusion/Advice.

You break it down by asking and answering the questions on the first page of the part of the 'Torts Handout' titled 'Negligence'.

The information about the case you need (what happened in the case) can be found in a video on youtube.com: Woman Burned by McDonald's Hot Coffee, Retro Report, The New York Times.

For a little written about the case check out: Liebeck v McDonald's Restaurants h2o.law.harvard.edu