If only 1 in 30,000 people show negative health symptoms from exposure to a chemical pollutant, does that mean a public official should deregulate the chemical for a population of 400 million? Group of answer choices It depends on the healthiness of the population as a whole. Yes, they should deregulate the chemical. In this case, only 1,300 people would be negatively affected. Not necessarily. Individual risk and population risk are different. A small risk for an individual can translate to a large risk and cost at the population level. In this case, more than 13,000 people would be negatively affected. It depends on how much the chemical company will pay for the public official's future political campaigns