If Paul tries to sue Rory for injuries he suffered while attempting to grill his own burger, what would be Rory's best defense? a) Paul cannot establish that Rory owed a duty of care to him. b) Rory did not breach the duty of care because a reasonable person would allow his friend to use the grill. c) There is no causation because it is not foreseeable that allowing someone to grill can result in a grease-related burn. d) Defense of assumption of risk does not apply to activities like grilling. e) All of the above defenses are available to Rory f) None of the above defenses would work for Rory