If requestion is made under s 249D and after the 21 day period, the company informs the requishionist that the 249D notice is invalid, can the requishinist arrange to hold a meeting under s 249E as the 21 day period has expired, or will they be barred from using s249E due to the 249D notice being invalid? Note: it is likely that although the s 249D notice is invalid on its face, it is a procedural irregularity which does not cause substantial injustice, therefore, very likely court will find that it is not invalid under s 1322(2).